Instant Replay Needs To Be Implemented

Bruce Jenkins just wrote a column regarding umpires and the need to bring in a replay system of some sort. I think he hit the nail right on the head: the umpires lost their right to have unanswered calls through sheer incompetence to keep the traditional system.

ogc Thoughts

I've been for a replay system to be put into place, but I've not heard a better, more succinct wording of why it must be done until now:  the umpires lost their right to have unanswered calls through sheer incompetence to keep the traditional umpiring system.  Not that all umpiring is incompetent, but enough that I feel that something needs to be done.  I've been on board for changing the umpiring situation for many decades now.

Hopefully the MLB will do something, but I've been discouraged that anything will happen with umpires since Sandy Alderson left the Commissioner's Office. Sandy's moves, including his great move to accept only certain umpire's letters of resignation (and his great quote on that:  "it is either a threat to be ignored or offer to be accepted"), gave me hope that something would eventually be done, but instead he moved on, and a pitcher lost his perfect no-hitter plus other travesties like the latest string of complaints have happened.

If tradition is the be-all and end-all, they would all still be playing with paper thin gloves, use balls until they are falling apart, spike each other in the legs when sliding, use spitballs regularly, and the homerun ball would still be gauche while the stolen base would still be king.  Times change, technology changes, tradition changes.

For me, it has nothing to do with good teams or bad teams, it has to do with getting the correct result in any game. Recently, there was an out call made when the firstbaseman's foot was a good foot or more off the bag. And while good teams don't usually get beat by bad calls, it can cost them a playoff berth.  The Giants nearly did not make the 2010 playoffs because the umpire called Ishikawa out at home plate when he clearly scored, looking at the replay, costing the Giants a win.  Mistakes that are so obvious using current technology simply cannot be tolerated.

And I love baseball's perfect/imperfect blend as much as anyone else. I think that there is greater skill involved - see how many high school teenagers make it in other sports vs. baseball - and that is part of why I love it, as I see/feel the difference.  As a former (not so good) ballplayer, I can appreciate the ability involved with professional baseball.  As a humanist, I don't want baseball to be sterile either.

I also feel that the MLB can be improved by a replay system. I'm tired of lazy umpiring. I'm tired of blown calls. I'm not there to listen to the umpire call a strike, though that is nice sometimes. I'm there to watch baseball and to see a team's or individual's efforts ruined because the umpire was clearly wrong is infuriating, whether it is my team or another, whether it is a nearly perfect game or a laugher of epic proportions.

I like the human element too so that is why I'm OK with keeping the umpires around and to have them call the strikes (though that also bothers me too). With all the new technologies, I would like to see the MLB better enforce the strikezone as well, grading umpires on their calls, creating minimum standards for consistency with penalties up to losing their job for incompetence.  And instant replay is another aspect of improving umpiring that makes even more sense, to me, at least with balls and strikes, you can maybe recover from a blown call.  Costing a team the tying or winning run is another thing, there are some mistakes that clearly costs one team and benefits the other..

So I totally agree that the human element needs to still be in there, but I really hate when umpires get in the way of the game, the purity of the game, if you will. The game will never be perfect, but at least get the calls right to the best extent possible without ruining or slowing the game.

Bruce's suggestion makes a lot of sense, and there is usually a break in play where the reviewing umpire can override an erroneous call. You don't even need the umpires or the managers asking for a review, the review umpire job is to correct wrong calls, so he should be able to buzz the home plate umpire and inform him of any calls that are changed by the reviewing umpire or let him know it is OK to proceed, that there will be no call.  That way, the home ump keeps the attention of the crowd and not a voice on the loudspeakers announcing to the crowd, like the Wizard of Oz.

That's 15 extra umpires per season,which would probably cost this multi-billion dollar industry less than $5M per season to implement, given how good TV broadcasts are at supplying all the angles almost immediately.  That's a small price to pay to fix egregious umpire errors, and it won't add much time either, to the game, almost seamless, part of the action.  You just have the reviewing umpire somewhere with a panel of screens with the ability to view any play by the various camera angles available.  And he communicates directly with the home plate umpire, who will announce any changed plays.

As much as I enjoy seeing a manager lose it sometimes on calls, I just want the umpires to get it right on the close calls.   To expect humans to do so is folly, but we have the technology to at least help the situation without much additional cost nor much additional time added.  I would also like to see further changes related to consistent strikezones, if not across all umpires, then at least that each umpire is consistent in his calls.  But I understand that a traditional sport like baseball will only change gradually, one battle at a time.

Your 2010 Giants are 50-42: Two Necessary Evils: D-gers and Umpires

Every hero needs a good villain.  The D-gers are that in the Giants hiStory.  And we'll be playing three in the hell that is LA in this series.

One Thing to Accept Human Mistakes, Another for History to be Re-written

The Giants got ripped off from a sweep of the Mets by the umpires, specifically the home umpire, Phil Cuzzi.  Even the opposing catcher admitted that Ishikawa was safe, as reported by the great Henry Schulman of the Chronicle.  The only person in the stadium who apparently did not see this was the person who had the decision in his hands, the home umpire.  Another in the long line of egregious umpire mistakes, capped by the ruining of the perfect no-hitter by James Joyce (who otherwise seems like a nice person and good umpire by most accounts) earlier this season.

Most arguments for why baseball should not put in replays argues for the human element to stay  in baseball and not take out umpires.  Last I heard ballplayers are human, and more importantly, is the story we all follow.  Whether they succeed or fail is what the fans want to see.  Umpires are the necessary evil we tolerate so that we may enjoy our reality show, the show that started all the reality shows (but that's another story :^).

First, most people who are upset about this are not calling for umpires to be replaced.  I myself enjoy when the umpire gooses things with a nice "Stee-rike threee" echoing through the stadium or an emphatic out call.  Most are only asking for the adding of replay as an option during the game for a crucial moment.

Second, some people are against it because it lengthens the game.  Hate to break it to them, but we are already doing it.  There are regularly breaks for the umpires to huddle together and agree on what actually happened on a plate, calls to the umpires at 1B and 3B to see if the batter checked his swing or not, plus, and here is the killer, video review to see if the homer was really a homer.  And to bite the hand that feeds the game, there are numerous commercial breaks that lengthen the game as well.  Maybe they can take one less commercial break when there is such a critical play such as this.

Third, there is a very easy way to limit umpire reviews of video replay:  just put them into the rules.  These types of plays rarely happens more than one time per team per game.  So one way to deal with this is to give each team one play per game to ask the umpires to review the play.   Or it could be once per week or once per month, but in that case, I would allow teams to accumulate such calls, but still allow only one per game.  This gives some additional strategic moves for the manager to contemplate.

Ultimately, I have nothing against umpires, I can accept that they are human and will makes mistakes.  I am not asking for sensors all over the place and detect exactly what happens on every play.  I only have a problem with the fact that we have very simple and available technology that can be used to give the umpires another look at the situation to see if they had made an outrageous mistake that is a significant factor in how the game turns out.

Why not admit that you are human and sometimes need help.  Most of the time, their mistakes only add to the tension of a particular count or situation, and I can accept that.  But if the mistake is one that changes who the winner is and who the loser is, or ruins a great accomplishment by a player, and all it would take is a 5 minute review to make sure that you got it right.  I don't think that is asking too much.

If that is such a huge problem, then why not get rid of all the other checks:  no more checking on check swings, no more umpire huddling to see if the umpire got his call right, no more checking on the HR call.  It is what it is, they are human and baseball doesn't really care if they got that call right, just deal with it. Or, better, add another layer of replay review usable only in certain situations at the manager's discretion.

FYI, there is a great post discussing Cuzzi's history of blowing calls at this new Giants site I ran across, 8thInningWeirdness.

Sanchez Maturity

There was only one good thing to take away from that game, and that is that Jonathan Sanchez showed his maturity and steadiness in this start.  First, he was going up against his idol.  Pressure games like that before would cause him to be wild and lose command.  In 7 innings, he gave up only 6 hits and 1 walk, while striking out 5.   He only gave up 2 ER.

In addition, the MLB reporter noted this blown call and included additional quotes from the Mets catcher, who also noted what the KNBR announcing crew was noting on-air, that the homeplate umpire was very inconsistent in his calls.  The KNBR team took to dismissively noting after every two-strike pitch taken by a batter that the umpire appears to not be calling any strikes when the batter does not swing the bat, and thus would call it a ball, he was that odd in his ball and strike calls.  Yet, again, Sanchez did not melt down, he was calm, cool, and collected.  I guess Whiteside catching helped him a bit.

First, A Question/Poll

Does anyone enjoy or find my discussion about the starters, which follows this, useful or interesting?  That question popped in my mind, and I thought I would ask for feedback.  I got in this habit last season, and while I find it interesting at times, I can see that maybe it's not really adding value much either.  Or if you have any suggestions, I'll be happy to consider them.  I just don't want to waste my time doing something nobody cares about.

FYI

Eugenio Velez called up, Joe Martinez sent down (Schulman tweet).  However, Wellemeyer is having a rehab start in Fresno tonight, so somebody on the 25 man roster should not get comfortable, either Velez or a reliever will probably go down when Wellemeyer is ready, perhaps within a week.

Game 1:   James McDonald vs. Bumgarner

MLB Notes:

Giants:  In his first start against the division-rival Dodgers, Bumgarner will be looking for his third consecutive win. In his last outing before the All-Star break against Washington, the rookie lefty threw six innings of one-run ball, allowing seven hits and striking out six.

D-gers:  Barring something unforeseen, James McDonald will make his 2010 Dodgers debut as the latest fifth-starter. It was McDonald's job to lose last April and he did. He bowed out of the running early this spring and spent the first half regaining his command and confidence.

Bumgarner should win the game.  If Ely were still pitching well, McDonald wouldn't have been called up.  The D-gers are desperate for starting pitching and if McDonald, who had a poor (relatively to the majors) 4.17 ERA in AAA, can't cut it, they will be reaching out to free agents who are still sitting on the sidelines, like Pedro Martinez, starting pitchers who were just dumped (like the Cards grabbing the yummy Jeff Suppan and hoping they have another Jeff Weaver on their hands), because they really have a bare cupboard of prospects and can't expect to trade their way into a nice starting pitcher.

So McDonald, who hasn't performed that well in AAA in brief stints over the years, should not be expected to pitch a great game for the D-gers, while Bumgarner has been on a nice roll.  Should be a Giants win (but as always, it's all relative).

Game 2:   Clayton Kershaw vs. Lincecum

MLB Notes:

Giants:  Lincecum is coming off a shutout gem against the Mets, in which he allowed only six hits and, perhaps more importantly, only issued one walk. Against the Dodgers on April 17, Lincecum allowed one run in seven innings to earn the win.

D-gers:  Clayton Kershaw has been pretty good at bouncing back from rough starts and he gets another chance in this game after getting pushed around by the Cardinals in 4 1/3 innings. Kershaw had unusual trouble with fastball command in steamy Busch Stadium.

Kershaw pitches much, much better at home (2.70 ERA) than on the road for his career.  But the big change for him this year is that he has pitched well at home (3.23 ERA) as well as the road (3.08 ERA), so he is having a breakthrough type of season.  He is their  Madison Bumgarner, and he has handled the Giants well in the past.  

Still, he has a huge battle on his hands going up against Lincecum.  Not only great for his career,  Lincecum  put things together two starts ago and continued throwing well in his last start.  No reason to think he won't do it again, particularly in LA where he has a 3.46 career ERA there.   

It should be a good battle, pretty even, but have to give the lean to Lincecum for his general brilliance in performance and, more importantly, his brilliance in his last two starts, as he shut down two teams with good offenses in the Brewers and Mets:  16 IP, 10 hits, 3 walks, 15 strikeouts, 0.56 ERA.

Game 3:   Chad Billingsley vs. Zito

MLB Notes:

Giants:  Zito began the second half by allowing just two hits in eight innings against the Mets. Zito is historically much more dominant in the second half compared to the first, sporting a better record (76-40 to 65-70) and ERA (3.39 to 4.18).

D-gers:  According to manager Joe Torre, Chad Billingsley's problems in St. Louis were caused by a recurring mechanical flaw that has hounded him since last year and results in flattening out his pitches. He lasted only four innings and gave up 10 hits.

Zito is normally great in the second half, and this time was pretty good in the first half as well.  Billingsley is the D-gers Matt Cain, but unlike Cain, his ERA is on an upward trajectory, instead of a downward one like Cain, for his career.  Most prospect experts had Cain and Billingsley as comparable pitchers, but usually gave the nod to Billingsley but Cain has been better thus far in his career overall.  Billingsley's ERA was 4.26 ERA in his career against the Giants at home, so he has struggled a bit with our offense previously and was struggling this season and in his last start, so I would call it even in deference to his good performances before but have to lean towards Zito for how they have performed this season plus Zito's usual second half improvements.  He also has a 3.32 ERA in his career in LA.  

Giants Thoughts

That umpire's call still makes me sick.  It would have been a stirring sweep and would have given us better momentum going into the LA series.  Plus we lost a game against San Diego in the standings.

Now we got a kick in the gut and have to rise above that in this series.  The Giants this season has had a number of ups and downs, but have been able to rise to the challenge (as well as fall) a number of times, so this will be another test of their will and readiness to take the next step forward.  We particularly need our pitchers to continue their nice run that started after the All-Star break.

Seems like we have a good chance of winning the series and outside chance of sweeping.  We need to win the series, and obviously ideally sweep the series, and return the favor to them for sweeping us earlier.  Winning the series puts us two games ahead of LA, but sweeping puts us four games ahead of them.  Both the pitching and the offense will need to execute.  Unfortunately, both have been spotty in producing this season, though obviously good during this stretch, particularly the offense, though the pitching has been better since the break.

The D-gers seem to rise to the task against us with Torre at the helm.  They were 11-7 against us last season, 5-1 this season.  They have won 6 of 8 series, sweeping two of them.

Zito had a nice game last time, just didn't have offense.  Only Burrell and Rowand had good offense.  Sandoval was OK, but all the other starters struggled, including Molina, who is no longer here, and Huff and Posey, who have been our hottest hitters since.  Uribe was battling a hurt ring finger, but with the All-Star break to heal up, he has been 4-13 with a walk.

Atop our lineup we have an issue.  Sanchez I'm getting a little worried about, after hitting well for a while, he has been in a 6 week slide where he has hit .224/.274/.291/.565 during that time.  We are winning in spite of his struggles in the 2-spot, which he might need to relinquish if he continues any further, though he at least brought it up a notch during the winning, hitting .255/.305/.309/.614.  But we need more than that if we are to beat LA.

Luckily, the LA series marked the ending of lead-off hitter, Torres, two-week slide which he followed up by hitting .306/.370/.695/1.064.  That more than made up for Sanchez's struggles, but we can't expect Torres to hit THAT well in the future, though a mid-800 OPS does appear to be his talent level right now after he revamped his batting mechanics.  And that OBP range is probably sustainable, he just went crazy and hit 5 homers in an 8 game stretch, which obviously helped with the great winning stretch.  He drove in 9 runs during that period.

But, hate as much to say this, but with Posey's emergence during this winning stretch, he will need to continue to step up and produce big numbers.  He would put an exclamation point on this period  of winning if he can help lead the Giants to good results here in LA.  That, along with Bumgarner starting today could make a big statement to LA that this is the new Giants generation, led by these new guys.

No Giants rookie position prospect has put a similar charge into the offense since probably Will Clark joining the team (Sandoval was a nice addition, but was merely steadily good when he came up; he did not go crazy on the opposition until the following season in June, when he was no longer a rookie).

Go Giants!  Beat LA!

No Better Reason For Instant Replay Rule Now

I'm sure you heard about the Armando Gallaraga perfect game fiasco where the umpire blew the call on THE LAST PLAY OF THE GAME.  I've been wanting this for years now, if not decades.  Unfortunately, it would take something like this to move things.

Hopefully NOW the umpires and/or MLB will agree on some way to implement instant replay to handle instances like this.  I don't know how - red phone hot line, replay machine for umpires similar to when they are trying to figure out whether a home run is hit or not, whatever - mainly because this is something that will be negotiated to death by all concerned, but something has to be done to prevent such a travesty again.

I understand that umpires are not perfect.  But in such a situation, something has to be allowed to make things right.