Lots of interesting news on the roster composition (
Baggerly,
Schulman,
Pavlovic, and
Schulman on Fontenot).
First big news is that the Giants are planning to carry 12 pitchers, not 11, even though Vogelsong will be on the DL and his turn in the rotation will be skipped. The worry is that Zito might have a short start and thus tax the bullpen early. This change in plans is good news for a pitcher looking for an opportunity to show off what he's got. The media list Dan Otero, Steve Edlefson, and Jean Machi as the possibles, and I agree with their thinking that Dan Otero is the guy they bring up.
I've liked Otero for a while now. His K/BB ratios are out of this world. I'm not sure why he's been slowly brought up the farm system, though looking at his seasonal stats, it looks like he probably got injured in late 2009 and missed a good portion of 2010, and thus why they have been slow since, to give him time to recover and get back to 100%. His stats remind me of Sergio Romo.
Of course, the other eleven pitchers are Lincecum, Bumgarner, Cain, Zito as the starters, in that order, and Wilson, Casilla, Romo, Affeldt, Lopez, Mota, and Hensley in the bullpen. I have liked the pickup of Hensley, but with Zito's struggles, I think I like it even more.
Not that I don't think Zito will eventually prove useful enough that we keep him around, but with Mota and Hensley around, another pitcher could be crappy (remember, Bumgarner didn't do that well in early 2011 either and the bullpen was used a lot with Madison doing poorly and Zito struggling, most probably due to internal injuries from his car accident, before he DLed). I think Zito will be fine as our 4th or 5th starter, in any case, as people forget that the vast majority of teams do not have that great a 4th or 5th starter. Let Surkamp mature and develop a little more in AAA, that's where he would have been if he wasn't the emergency starter last year and brought up.
The next big news is that Bochy backed off from committing to Whiteside or Stewart as the only backup, they could carry three, but they could also carry one and perhaps neither of those two, which would imply that Hector Sanchez as the only backup scenario is being discussed by Bochy and Sabean. Not too shocking given how well Sanchez has been hitting all spring.
I view this more as a dry hump where Bochy teases the fan base with this possibility, as a reward to Sanchez for how well he has done in the spring, but I expect him to say something to the effect that "it was a very hard decision to make, a tough one, but we really think a lot of Sanchez's potential and think it is best for him to start in AAA and get regular playing time." And I agree with that.
We still don't know what we got with Hector. Most prospect analyst books say that he's more of a future backup catcher type. But look at the hitting he has done as well as the raves he got as a catcher from pitchers last season. Given Posey's uncertainty long-term at C (I still see him moving to 3B or possibly 2B eventually - I originally had him going to 2B, but Panik looks good there plus I saw a comment that Posey might not have the ability to handle 2B, particularly after his injury. Of course, if he moves to 3B, Sandoval would move to 1B, and that works in terms of how good either is with the bat, Posey is just an ordinary hitter at 1B, very good at 3B), I think the Giants have to see if they can get Sanchez to develop into a starting catcher, because as nicely as Tommy Joseph has done so far and as nicely as Andrew Susac looks in being good offensively and defensively, you never know when they will hit the wall developmentally, even Hector too. It is not like Hector is only anybody's Top 100 prospects in baseball list. We have to continue to develop Hector as a starting catcher. And that happens fastest with him in AAA in 2012, at least to start.
Besides, I think Stewart is more than adequate as backup. The main call for him to start at catcher, at least initially, is when Posey gets moved to 1B for a start, pushing Huff either out or to LF (where then Schierholtz is out). That works best with a LH starter going, and last season Stewart hit .295/.392/.409/.801 against LHP and he is 278/.371/.407/.778 lifetime. Plus, he was rated by the Fielding Bible to be among the leaders in the majors in preventing runs with his defense, that despite it being a counting stat (meaning the more you play, the more you can produce) and he only played roughly a third of the innings that the leaders played as starters. He could be perfect in a platoon with a LH-hitting catcher and late innings replacement.
For the rest of the roster, right now the starting lineup looks like this: Posey C, Huff 1B, Burriss 2B, Sandoval 3B, Crawford SS, Cabrera LF, Pagan CF, and Schierholtz RF. The Giants have been clearly telegraphing that Belt most probably will end up starting at 1B in AAA, particularly with that talk recently with Meulens saying that Belt has holes that he needs to fix up.
Fans will be upset with that but people forget that spring training is often an experimental practice ground for some of the pitchers. They are not pitching to Belt solely to get him out, they will be trying out different pitches and different patterns. But once the real season begins, if he still has the holes the Giants think he has, he will be exposed AGAIN like last season.
I see some are drinking Belt's Kool-Aid, but I'll point it out again: none of the prospect hounds or Giants fans thought much of Belt when he was drafted, but the Giants were the ones who 1) saw the potential, 2) helped him recraft his mechanics, and 3) gave him the opportunity to fly up the minors to the majors, so if anyone understands how good Belt is and where he's going wrong, it is the Giants.
I think we can all agree that Belt has great potential for great things in baseball. Why not make sure that he is ready and not have him yo-yo up and down? People also forget that great prospects do not always become great players. Hello Andy Marte, Sean Burroughs, etc. People also forget that Belt clearly has some hole(s) because he struck out at a 30% rate in AAA and the majors.
And, furthermore, yes, he might hit well in the majors now, and be a good player, but if he can cut down the strikeouts to how he was doing it in AA, he could be a major star, hitting for average, walking a lot, striking out a little, hitting a lot of homers, plus great defense to boot. Moreover, once you dump Huff (as many Belt believers think), you don't have that option anymore, we are pretty much stuck with Belt at 1B, no matter how poorly he is hitting. We need the risk mitigation that sending Sanchez and Belt to the minors provide, and that is something that fans do not understand yet, but that I've been harping on for a number of years now.
What if Sanchez and Belt were brought up and they fail. Yeah, yeah, yeah, they're so good they can't, right? But good prospects fail all the time, Matt Weiters came up and hit nowhere close to what people thought he would hit. After two so-so seasons, he finally started hitting consistently last season, his third one.
What if the Giants do as the fans ask and they play and play but at the end of May, they are still not over the Mendoza Line? Can someone say "the offense probably stinks"? Because Huff would be gone in most fans' scenario, traded away for a thong.
Or what if Posey is struggling as well, or worse, injured again? Keeping only Sanchez most probably means we lost Stewart to waivers, who not only is good defensively but good hitting against LHP? A team out there will want him to be at least a platoon/backup catcher. So we probably have Whiteside as our starter and Jackson Williams as our backup catcher, as they send Sanchez down to AAA to figure out his bat. Do we really need another Bocock moment?
With both in the minors, we get to see whether: 1) Huff's Pilates work helped out or not and he's hitting or not, 2) Posey holds up to the workload or not, 3) Stewart holds up as backup catcher seeing more playing time, 4) Cabrera, Pagan, and Schierholtz produces as our starting OF. Then if any of those fail, hopefully Sanchez and Belt is doing what we hope they can be doing in the minors and be brought up in May sometime, or maybe Peguero might breakout and start in the OF. Risk mitigation, options provide that.
I think Huff will be fine in 2012, closer to his career batting line than 2011's. I've looked at the teams he's been on, plus been observing his interviews, and he is not a leader. Nothing wrong with that, but while he makes airs about that, he's not. If anything, he's the class clown, and you don't need to go far to see that, with his whole Rally Thong routine. And people might not recall, but Huff was hitting OK, but nothing good, until Pat Burrell joined the team and started hitting great, at which point, Huff started hitting great. Pat Burrell is a leader, an instigator, but Aubrey is not (and again, nothing wrong with that).
And I noticed that on teams where he's the offensive leader, he's usually struggling, having a lower half seasonal batting line for his career, but when he's surrounded by hitters, he relaxes and is able to hit well. No shame in that. A lot of hitters struggle when they have the weight of the world on their shoulders. Ishikawa couldn't hit for anything in 2009 until he "put himself in God's hands" and stopped thinking about it. He hit close to .800 OPS the rest of the way (I still think he can be a good 1B for a team somewhere; he's with the Brewers, last I heard). How many times have we heard a batter say that his breakthrough in getting out of a slump was to stop thinking and just follow that ol' rule: see ball, hit ball?
This season, with Sandoval and Posey back, plus Cabrera and Pagan up top, Huff should not feel as much pressure. Particularly Sandoval, he could have had 30+ homers last season had he played the full season and most hitters suffered a loss of power during the season after having hamate bone surgery, so what if he was held back and does even better in 2012? DrB noted 40 homer potential for Pablo and my analysis agreed.
And I think the offense not only will be much improved, but will be up there with the 2010 team. Pagan looks good as the replacement for the 2010 Torres, but even if not, Gregor Blanco looks like he could be the second coming of Torres. He could step in for Pagan, should he fail to get going.
And even if Pagan is playing well, Blanco will probably get his chances, like Torres did. Unfortunately, Schierholtz's style of playing appears to invite danger and injuries. I've seen players like that through baseball history, Pistol Pete Reiser was like that for the Brooklyn Dodgers, he was good when he played, but he was injured so, so much. I would put Aaron Rowand in that category, he would be hitting well for us, grooving the balls, then he would get injured, one way or another, and there goes the season. So I see Nate going down, again, at some point in the season. Still, if he's healthy, I think that he could have a breakout year, when he is on, he's white hot.
I think Crawford will surprise with his hitting. He impressed me greatly last season, being able to avoid strikeouts by getting his bat on the ball and putting it into play. I felt that with adjustments, the balls he hit would turn to base hits and that started happening late in the 2011 season, then he continued it in the AFL and then Spring Training. I would bet on him and Blanco as the likely nice surprises of 2012 out of the hitters.
Burriss I'm still not sold on. I've seen too many prospects do well in spring, only to disappoint in the regular season. But this is his do-or-die season so at least we get to try him out as starter for a while, and see whether he finally broke out or if he's a AAAA player. And no matter what he does, there is also the possibility that the Washington Nat's might be willing to give us an OK prospect for him in trade, as he's a local D.C. product and they might be looking for a 2B, as they are not sold on Desmond, from what I've read.
I think Cabrera will do enough to justify the trade. He probably won't duplicate 2011's stats, but I wouldn't be surprised if he does, because players sometimes breakout at his age, as their cumulative experience finally adds up for them and/or they finally grow up and prepare properly for the baseball season. Even if he produces what he did in 2009 (which is roughly what he produced from 2009-2011), that is good enough for our offense to win a lot of games with our pitching, if everyone one else hits as projected.
I don't know about Pagan. That is why I'm glad we have Blanco and Belt/Huff in case he fails. Risk mitigation is a wonderful thing.
Posey, nobody knows. So far, so good, everything as progressed very well, looks great. I cross my fingers and hope for the best. That's partly why I want Sanchez in the minors. I want him getting ready to be the starter for us, in case of any issues with Posey's return to baseball. We don't know if Posey has to play 1B all season in 2012, or even sit out the season. Risk mitigation. Plus, keeping Stewart, if Posey for any reason cannot catch, a platoon of Stewart and Sanchez should be a good enough imitation of Posey that our lineup will bend but not break, particularly if Sandoval and Cabrar are hitting..
That leaves the bench. Obviously, one backup catcher and I don't see how there can be two, we need all the spots for versatility. I think Brett Pill got one spot, he has been OK playing all the corner positions and would be the power bat off our bench. I think with the uncertainty about Franchez and Burriss, plus they just waived Fontenot, they are clearly keeping Theriot, likely for the reasons Schulman noted, that the team needs right-handed hitters. And Gregor Blanco has done so well, plus all the columnists think that he's in for sure (the waiving of Fontenot also fills the Giants need for a 40-man spot for Gregor Blanco), and that's four bench spots.
I don't see how the Giants can go with only one backup middle infielder, so I would guess that Joaquin Arias has impressed the coaching staff enough to win the last bench spot. He has impressed with his defense and has been a good hitter in the minors. But this could be how they keep Hector Sanchez up as well. That would also explain Bochy's hesitation to note Stewart or Whiteside as the backup catcher..
Now, if the Giants keep Arias, this would be a stretch and depends on the arcane rules of 40 man rostering, but if Pill has any options left, he could go to AAA, with Blanco and Burriss, in that order, covering the corner OF positions, and that could open things up for bringing Hector Sanchez as a backup catcher. Again, I prefer him starting in AAA, but this is still a possibility, if Pill has any options left.
