Wednesday, May 02, 2018

newPQS Doesn't Work Well So I'm Creating ogcPQS

I'm still not happy with the new PQS methodology.  For me, the idea of this methodology is to separate the good from the average and the bad.  I'm going to have to go my own way with this going forward.  I will get to the April edition of PQS later this week, maybe next.

ogc thoughts

The old methodology did this, as per the data provided regarding the difference between old and new shows:

PQS:  DOM starts had 2.32 ERA (from 2012-2014), DEC had 4.54 ERA, DIS had 11.20 ERA
newPQS:  DOM starts had 1.56 ERA, DEC had 3.70 ERA, and DIS had 7.92 ERA.

These make sense, but there are problems when you look deeper.

newPQS Doesn't Make Sense

So DEC looks decent and that's good but when you look at the underlying stats, newPQS does not make sense:

0 newPQS:  10.01 ERA; 2.23 WHIP; 4.8 K/9; 1.0 K/BB
1 newPQS:    6.75 ERA; 1.86 WHIP; 5,8 K/9; 1.4 K/BB
2 newPQS:    4.56 ERA; 1.45 WHIP; 7.3 K/9; 2.4 K/BB
3 newPQS:    2.89 ERA; 1.16 WHIP; 7.7 K/9; 2.9 K/BB
4 newPQS:    2.00 ERA; 0.91 WHIP; 8.5 K/9; 4.6 K/BB
5 newPQS:    0.95 ERA; 0.71 WHIP; 8.9 K/9; 7.5 K/BB
NL 2012-14:  4.03 ERA; 1.30 WHIP; 7.2 K/9; 2.6 K/BB

How is 2.89 ERA and 1.16 WHIP just DECENT?   The K/9 rate there is not great, just barely above average, but a 2.89 ERA is very good  and 2.9 K/BB is good, and yet it is not categorized as good start.

newPQS Doesn't Work Well

Looking over the majors pitching stats for 2012-2014, the average ERA was roughly 4.00, WHIP was roughly 1.30, strikeout rate was roughy 7.2, K/BB was roughly 2.6, which makes 3 newPQS at 2.89 ERA, 1.16 WHIP, 5.3 K/9 and 2.9 K/BB a pretty good pitcher.   The whole point, I thought was to find the dominant pitchers, and 2.89 ERA is pretty dominant, so is 1.16 WHIP.

On top of that, from 2012-2014, there are only 5 starting pitchers out of 131 qualifiers that had an ERA better than 2.89.   And for the individual seasons:  for 2012, only 9 of 88, for 2013, only 10/80, and for 2014, only 19/88 had an ERA of 2.89 or better.   2.89 ERA is pretty elite, and these pitchers did it over a whole season, not just in one 3 newPQS start.

newPQS works for what it is intended, which is to find dominant pitchers who would be good for fantasy league teams:  high strikeout and high K/BB ratio (which is linked to low ERA).  For example, I took pitchers in 2017 with at least 9 starts (unfortunately, was unable to separate out starts from relief, so there is a mix) and split them up into various K/BB buckets (that are roughly about the same number in each):

GT 3.5:    3.44 ERA; 1.131 WHIP; 9.62 K/9; 4.42 K/BB; 8.00 H/9
3.0-3.49:  3.70 ERA; 1.231 WHIP; 9.32 K/9; 3.12 K/BB; 8.09 H/9
AVG:       4.34 ERA; 1.352 WHIP; 8.4   K/9; 2.49 K/BB; 9.33 H/9
2.5-2.99:  4.41 ERA; 1.358 WHIP; 7.90 K/9; 2.74 K/BB; 9.24 H/9
2.0-2.49:  4.69 ERA; 1.396 WHIP; 7.33 K/9; 2.21 K/BB; 9.24 H/9
LT 2.0:     5.04 ERA; 1.507 WHIP; 6.88 K/9; 1.68 K/BB; 9.46 H/9

As you can see from the above, if we had a pitcher who pitched 3 newPQS in each and every game in the season, and averaged 2.89 ERA, 1.16 WHIP, and 2.9 K/BB, he would rate among the best pitchers in the league, but according to newPQS methodology, he would only be considered decent.

So I'm at a crossroads.  I'm probably not going to use newPQS during the season, as my goal is to illuminate which pitchers have been dominant.

Below are the oldPQS stats:

0 PQS:    12.08 ERA; 2.59 WHIP; 7.4 K/9; 1.3 K/BB
1 PQS:      7.21 ERA; 1.95 WHIP; 3.8 K/9; 0.9 K/BB
2 PQS:      5.84 ERA; 1.72 WHIP; 5.4 K/9; 1.5 K/BB
3 PQS:      4.07 ERA; 1.41 WHIP; 6.0 K/9; 2.0 K/BB
4 PQS:      2.84 ERA; 1.10 WHIP; 7.4 K/9; 3.3 K/BB
5 PQS:      1.74 ERA; 0.86 WHIP; 9.5 K/9; 5.1 K/BB
NL12-14:  4.03 ERA; 1.30 WHIP; 7.2 K/9; 2.6 K/BB (starting pitcher stats)

This distribution does better at what I would like PQS to do, which is to separate out the good starts from the mediocre starts, from the disaster bad starts.
oldPQS vs. newPQS Distribution 2012-2014
source:  2017 Baseball Forecaster

The main impetus, it seems, from the study explaining newPQS, is that the author of the study, who is not the same person as the one who created PQS in the first place, wanted the distribution of pitchers to be a normal curve from 0 to 5 PQS, and that is a good way to separate out the good pitchers from the bad, per fantasy purposes.

But that is not what I've been wanting for my studies, I wanted to be able to identify good starts, and then through a compilation of them, be able to see whether the starting pitcher was good or not, in order to better understand the Giants starting rotation, and whether it is competitively good or not.  I don't care that the distribution is now closer to a normal curve, nor do I care that DOM starts means the pitcher has struck out a lot, all I care about is identifying a quality start from a non-quality start, as many as there happen to be, damn the distribution.  And he has classified a bunch of good pitchers in the 3-PQS category.

That newPQS is a more normal curve is nice, but again, the purpose there is to find the best fantasy pitchers out there, whereas I want a more nuanced result, which is to find out which pitchers are good and which are bad, at delivering good results, that is, good ERA.   newPQS separates out pitchers who are good but not dominant, and I want to see all the good as well as the dominant starters.  That's what 5 PQS is for, anyway.

ogcPQS

I think I have no choice but to branch off now and do my own thing.  Unfortunately, I don't have a huge database of starting pitching game stats to perform analysis on and craft a perfect distribution, so I'll have to work from what was provided in the analysis leading up to newPQS.  Which is okay, I was plenty happy with what PQS had previously provided me, so these tweaks should make me happier.  I will go over each point category here.

Here is the data chart (if anyone knows how to copy a portion of the screen, and not the whole screen, please share):

Source:  2017 Baseball Forecaster
First off, long time readers will know that I have not been happy with the automatic 0-PQS given to starts under 5.0 IP, as I often noted how dominant the pitcher had been in particular starts, and would provide the PQS had it not auto-zeroed, plus noted how close the pitcher was to a PQS score.  Many of the auto-zero games would have registered as a Decent start had this rule been ignored.  This allows pitchers to get a PQS score if they earned it in any way.

However, I don't like the change to pitching into the 7th.  62% of all pitchers pitch at least 6 innings, but only 40% make it into the 7th and successfully get an out.   Even when pitchers were completing more starts than they were taken out, 6 innings was considered a quality start.  And in today's world of not allowing pitchers to face the lineup a third time (as exemplified by the Dodger's dogmatic usage of Rich Hill, especially in the playoffs; and to be fair, newPQS was designed before teams started this practice), it will be even harder for good pitchers to finish 6 innings.  I'm going to keep the 6 innings minimum.

That was another thing that bothered me about newPQS, as it appeared that the changes were not being made based on what constituted a good start, it was based on making the distribution more normal.  The new author took the methodology off it's original goal, in my opinion, of using sabermetric discoveries to inform the Quality Start metric.  And that was the original genesis of the PQS methodology, using sabermetric discoveries to identify when a pitcher was pitching well, and not just when a pitcher was having a good start.

I am okay with changing the hits logic to being less than the number of innings pitched.  I don't know how related either is to being a good pitcher, other than, obviously, less hits means a better pitched game.  I liked this rule because it helped to recognize pitchers who do happen to have a lower BABIP than the general mean, like Cain, but I don't know if there is any way to say what exactly is a good number of hits to give up in a start, as BABIP gods can rear their ugly heads

Looking at the starting pitcher data I collected in the table above categorized by K/BB ratio, there is a clear demarcation, though, at 3.0 K/BB:  below that, H/9 is over 9.0, whereas above that, roughly 8.0 H/9.  So clearly giving up less hits is a clear sign of a superior pitcher, so this change is a really in line with what the data says about separation between pitchers, of identifying who is good and who is not.  And thus I'm satisfied that this change will yield a better definition of a good DOM start.

I especially like the change to a minimum of 5 strikeouts.  This makes it much easier to score a start's PQS.  Of course, the motivation of the author was to get the percentage down to roughly 50% (he was very fixated on getting each individual metric to be 50%, which I understand from the viewpoint that in fantasy baseball, you want to distinguish who is the better pitcher) and not on what is considered good.  I didn't like that a pitcher could get a point for 3 strikeouts in 5 IP, so I'm okay with this.

And as nice as 4 strikeouts in 6 innings are, in today's baseball, that's only a 6.7 K/9, and the average K/9 in the NL for starting pitchers in 2017 was 8.0!  Even 5 in 6 innings only get you to 7.5 K/9, but at least that is closer to the reality in the MLB that strikeouts is going way up.  And obviously 7 strikeouts in a complete 9 inning start would only be 7.0 K/9.  I would have been okay with mentally calculating the K/9 by each start (as I'll explore next, not that many situations to remember), but this does simplify the metric.  I think a better rule would be this:  minimum of 5 strikeouts, but need IP-2 to earn a point if IP is greater than 6 IP, because now there are situations of 5 strikeouts in 8 or 9 IP, which is a very low K/9.  But that's complex to remember, and I like the simplicity of 5 strikeouts, so I'm going with that.

I get why he chose to push K/BB to to 3+, because that's easier to calculate in your head when scanning the boxscore.  But the average is still around 2.5 K/BB (2.54 K/BB for NL starters in 2017, in fact), and I've never had a problem calculating fractions in my head, I've been doing it since I was very young, as I loved math as a kid.  And as I noted, the author was fixated on getting to 50%, and using 3 (or if BB=0, K greater than or equal to 3), got him to roughly 50%.   So I'm going with 2.5, which he even mentioned in his study, but dismissed because of ease of calculation, plus the caveat for zero walks (that'll be harder to remember, though).

Plus, after a short while, you learn what is and isn't  greater than 2.5.  If there's 1 walk, you need 3 strikeouts anyway, but 2 walks get you to 5 strikeouts (instead of 6), 3 walks get you to 8 strikeouts (not the 9 the new rule would require), and 4 walks gets you to 10 strikeouts (not 12).   Any more walks, forget about it, probably not getting that point, even getting the point with 4 walks happens pretty rarely, I would bet.  Do it for a while and you quickly remember the above (hence my point above about strikeouts). 

So I'm going to use 2.5, as half the time (assuming walks are evenly distributed between even and odd), the ratio is higher than 2.5, and so it will even out over time to be higher than average.  And that's the beauty of this methodology that I like, that things do tend to even out for borderline type of stats.   And for 0 walks, I won't require a minimum of 3 K's, I'm giving it to the pitcher as long as he has at least one walk.  As I noted, don't know how these changes will work out for the overall PQS stats, but this makes sense to me, as a sign of a good starting pitcher.

Lastly, recognizing only no homeruns as a PQS score makes that really easy to calculate, it is an either or situation.  I'm kind of shocked that 52% of starts have zero homers and that 34% have only one homer, given the home run surge of the past few seasons.   And I would hate having to give a zero to a starter who pitched 7-8-9 innings and only gave up one homer.  Again, here the math would be easy to recognize, only give a point to those giving up one homer in 8-9 innings (or simply, a complete game).  But it's easier just to go with no homers at all and that covers over half the starts, so I'm good with that.

Since I don't have the started games data, I have no idea what all my changes does to PQS distributions or what a good DOM PQS percentage would be with the ogcPQS.  Since these are tweaks to the old formula, and as shown in the graphic above, some reductions, it will definitely be harder to get a DOM going forward, but much harder to get a DIS, given the dropping of the auto-zero rule.  I'm okay with my changes being conducive to identifying a well-pitched game, it is better than going with newPQS and my making a 3-PQS start a DOM start, which is another way I could have played it. 

I will reference this post in my PQS analysis going forward, as well as the originator's, to give them credit.  I will let this sit a few more days, before I go with my new methodology, in case I have any last second thoughts (but this has been worked on for a few weeks already, so I think this is it). 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Labels

1984 Draft (1) 2007 Draft (15) 2007 Giants (52) 2008 Draft (22) 2008 Giants (53) 2008 season (6) 2009 Draft (18) 2009 Giants (87) 2009 season (24) 2010 Decade (12) 2010 Draft (11) 2010 Giants (137) 2010 NL ROY award (1) 2010 season (19) 2010's (3) 2011 Draft (9) 2011 Giants (84) 2011 season (8) 2012 Draft (11) 2012 Giants (93) 2012 season (11) 2013 Draft (3) 2013 Giants (39) 2013 season (5) 2014 (1) 2014 draft (5) 2014 Giants (79) 2014 season (16) 2015 Draft (4) 2015 Giants (50) 2015 season (10) 2016 Draft (1) 2016 Giants (45) 2016 season (6) 2017 Draft (3) 2017 Giants (27) 2018 Draft (8) 2018 Giants (50) 2018 Season (8) 2019 Draft (1) 2019 Giants (27) 2019 season (2) 2020 Decade (1) 2020 Giants (9) 20201 Draft (1) 2021 Giants (3) 2022 Giants (2) 2023 Giants (14) 2023 season (1) 2024 Giants (8) 25 man roster (11) 25th man fallacy (1) 26 man roster (1) 3B (1) 40 Man Roster (11) 49ers (1) 5-day rotation (1) 51/49 decisions (1) 6-man rotation (5) 89 Quake (1) 89 World Series (1) A-Ball (1) A-Gon (1) A-Rod (3) A's (6) AA-Ball (1) Aaron Rowand (25) Abiatal Avelino (1) accomplishments (1) ace pitcher (2) ace starter (4) Adalberto Mejia (6) Adam Duvall (5) AFL (4) aggression (1) Albert Suarez (5) Alen Hanson (3) Alex Cobb (1) Alex Dickerson (2) Alex Hinshaw (3) Alex Pavlovic (1) Alexander Canario (2) All-Star Game (1) almost perfect game (1) Alonzo Powell (1) Amphetamine (3) analysis (24) Andre Torres (14) Andres Torres (2) Andrew Baiiley (1) Andrew Bailey (1) Andrew McCutchen (2) Andrew Suarez (5) Andrew Susac (11) Andy Baggerly (2) Andy Sisco (1) Andy Suarez (9) Angel Joseph (1) Angel Pagan (17) Angel Villalona (30) Anniversary (1) appendicitis (1) Aramis Garcia (2) Arbitration (19) Armando Benitez (5) Armando Gallaraga (1) art of failure (1) Asia-Pacific signing (1) assessment (1) Astros (3) At the Rate They Are Going (1) ATT Park (1) Aubrey Huff (20) Austin Jackson (2) Austin Slater (5) Award (4) BABIP (3) Bam Bam Meulens (1) Barry Bonds (30) Barry Zito (77) baseball (1) Baseball America (3) Baseball Prospectus (6) Baseball Prospectus Bias Against Giants (4) baseball strategy (9) Baseball Study (18) baserunning (2) batting peripherals (1) batting stance analysis (1) batting title champion (1) Beat LA (9) bench players (4) Bengie Molina (14) Benjamin Snyder (1) Bert Blyleven (1) best manager (2) best practices (2) Beyond the Box Score (1) Bias Against Giants (1) Big 6 (9) Big Picture (3) Bill Hall (1) Bill James (1) Bill James Handbook (2) Bill Mueller (1) Bill Neukom (21) Billy Beane (3) biography (1) Blake Riverra (1) Blake Snell (1) blog news (3) Blog Philosophy (3) Bob Howry (2) Bob Mariano (1) Bobby Evans (4) Boston Red Sox (1) Brad Hennessey (5) Brad Penny (2) Brandon Bednar (1) Brandon Belt (50) Brandon Crawford (25) Brandon Hicks (1) Braves (5) breakout (2) Brett Bochy (4) Brett Pill (9) Brewers (1) Brian Anderson (1) Brian Bannister (3) Brian Bocock (2) Brian Cooper (1) Brian Horwitz (3) Brian Ragira (2) Brian Sabean (50) Brian Wilson (14) Bridegrooms (6) Bruce Bochy (36) Bucky Showalter (1) bulllpen (8) Bullpen (33) Business Plan (23) Buster Posey (102) Byran Reynolds (2) Byung-Hyun Kim (1) Cained (4) call-ups (3) Candlestick Park (1) Cards (13) Career Prospects (4) Carl Hubbell (1) Carlos Beltran (4) Carlos Gomez (1) Carney Lansford (2) Carson Whisenhunt (1) Carter Jurica (1) Casey Kelly (1) Casey McGeHee (3) catcher injury (5) catching (3) CBT penalty (1) CC Sabathia (1) censorship (2) CEO (2) Chad Gaudin (5) Charles Culberson (5) Charlie Culberson (3) Chase Johnson (3) cheating (1) Chillax (1) Chris Brown (1) Chris Gloor (1) Chris Heston (19) Chris Lincecum (1) Chris Marrero (1) Chris O'Leary (1) Chris Ray (4) Chris Shaw (4) Chris Stewart (4) Chris Stratton (30) Chris Strattton (1) Christian Arroyo (7) Christmas (1) Christopher Dominguez (4) Christy Mathewson (1) Chuckie Jones (2) Clay Hensley (3) Clayton Blackburn (10) Clayton Tanner (3) Closer (9) closer by committee (3) Coaches (4) coaching changes (1) Cody Hall (2) Cody Ross (8) Col (1) Comeback Award (1) Commissioner (1) comparison (3) competitive advantage (1) Competitive Balance Tax (2) Competitive Cycles (2) competitiveness (2) Conner Menez (1) Connor Joe (3) Connor Nurse (1) Conor Gillaspie (25) contender (1) contract extension (3) contract negotiations (2) contract signing (7) Coordinator (1) core competency (1) Core Rotation (1) Cory Gearrin (5) Cory Guerrin (1) Cory Hart (1) Craig Whitaker (2) Cubs (1) Curt Young (1) cuts (1) Cy Young Award (5) cyber-relief (1) D-backs (16) D-gers (36) D-Rocks (3) D-Rox (17) D.J. Snelten (3) Dallas McPherson (1) Dan Ortmeier (11) Dan Otero (2) Dan Runzler (6) Dan Slania (3) Dan Uggla (1) Daniel Carbonell (1) Daniel Slania (2) Dany Jimenez (1) Darren Ford (1) Dave Righetti (1) Dave Roberts (11) David Aardsma (1) David Bell (1) David Huff (2) David Loewenstein (1) Decade of the Giants (12) decline (1) Defense (11) Deferred Money (1) deleted comment (1) Denard Span (3) depth (1) Dereck Rodriquez (7) Derek Holland (18) Derek Law (11) Detroit Tigers (1) DFA (3) DH (2) Dick Tidrow (2) dictionary (1) direction (1) Dirty (1) DL (3) dodgers (15) Donald Snelten (1) Donovan Solano (1) Draft (11) Draft Analysis (27) Draft Bonus (7) draft list (3) draft philosophy (2) draft signing (3) Draft Strategy (12) Draft Study (9) Draft Success (4) drafting (5) Dres (16) Drew Pomeranz (1) DRS (1) Dynasty (3) Earl Weaver (1) Edgar Renteria (13) Eduardo Nunez (4) Edwin Escobar (5) Ehire Adrianza (26) Eli Whiteside (4) Elimination game (1) EME (2) Emmanuel Burriss (18) end of an era (1) epic season (6) era (1) Eric Byrnes (1) Eric Surkamp (6) Erik Cordier (1) Eugenio Velez (12) evaluation (3) Evan Longoria (3) Evan Longoriia (1) extension (7) fan outrage (10) fan rants (2) fanfest (1) FanGraphs (2) Farhan Zaidi (35) feature reliever (1) felony conviction (1) Fielding (5) Fielding Stats (4) finger injury (3) first post-season press conference (3) Francisco Peguero (4) Fred Lewis (3) Freddie Lewis (17) Freddie Sanchez (4) Freddy Sanchez (7) Free Agency (8) free agent misses (1) Free agent possibilities (28) Free agent signing (22) Free agent signings (21) front office (3) Gabe Kapler (1) Game Score (3) gamer-tude (1) Garrett Williams (1) Gary Brown (26) Geno Espinelli (1) George Kontos (10) Ghosts of Giants Drafts (2) Giants (10) Giants Announcer (1) Giants blogs (3) Giants Chat (4) Giants Classic Rotation (1) Giants Defense (4) Giants Draft (15) Giants Drafts (8) Giants Farm System (34) Giants Franchise record (2) Giants Future (66) Giants GM (12) Giants Greats (3) Giants hitting manual (1) Giants Leadership (1) Giants manager (1) Giants No-Hitter (5) Giants Offense (34) Giants Offseason (24) Giants Pitching (10) Giants President of Baseball Operations (3) Giants Strategy (44) GiDar (1) Gino Espinelli (1) glossary (1) Gold Glove Award (1) good players (4) good will (1) Gorkys Hernandez (2) Graphical Player (1) great players (4) Gregor Blanco (18) Gregor Moscoso (1) Gregory Santos (1) Guillermo Moscoso (2) Guillermo Mota (2) Guillermo Quiroz (1) Gustavo Cabrera (4) Hall of Fame (10) Hall of Shame (4) Hank Aaron (5) Happy Holidays (2) Hate mail (1) Hayden Birdsong (1) healthy (1) heart-warming (1) Heath Hembree (8) Heath Quinn (1) Hector Correa (1) Hector Sanchez (12) Heliot Ramos (11) Henry Sosa (8) HGH (1) Hidden Game (1) high expectations (1) high school focus in draft (1) high velocity hitters (1) high velocity pitchers (1) hiring (2) hiring process (1) Hitter's League (1) Hitting (19) Hitting Coach (1) hitting mechanics (3) hitting pitchers (2) hitting streak (1) Hitting; (1) Home Run Career Record (7) Home Run Hitting Contest (1) Hunter Bishop (4) Hunter Pence (25) Hunter Stickland (1) Hunter Strickland (9) Ian Gardeck (1) Idea (4) IFA (1) improvement (2) Indictment (1) Infield (1) injury (7) instant replay (2) instructor (1) Interesting Question (1) International Free Agent Pursuits (5) International Signings (5) interview (5) Investment (1) Ivan Ochoa (2) J.P. Martinez (1) J2 (1) Jack Taschner (4) Jackson Williams (3) Jacob Dunnington (1) Jacob Gonzalez (2) Jacob Junis (1) Jacob McCasland (1) Jae-gyun Hwang (1) Jake Dunning (2) Jake Peavy (39) Jake Smith (1) Jake Wong (1) Jalen Miller (1) Jandel Gustave (1) Japanese Starters (1) Jarrett Parker (10) Jason Heyward (1) Jason Maxwell (2) Jason Stoffel (1) Javier Lopez (5) JC Gutierrez (3) JD Davis (1) Jean Machi (6) Jeff Kent (1) Jeff Samardzija (28) Jeff Suppan (1) Jeremy Affeldt (12) Jeremy Shelley (2) Jerome Williams (1) Jesse English (2) Jesse Foppert (1) Jesus Guzman (4) Jimmy Rollins (1) Joaquin Arias (14) Joe Panik (18) Joe Torre (1) Joey Bart (6) Joey Martinez (2) Johan Santana (1) John Barr (1) John Bowker (22) John Thorn (1) Johneshwy Fargas (2) Johnny Bench (1) Johnny Cueto (31) Johnny Monell (1) Johnny Rucker (1) Jonah Arenado (1) Jonathan Mayo (1) Jonathan Sanchez (49) Jordan Hicks (1) Jordan Johnson (1) Jorge Soler (1) Jose Canseco (1) Jose Casilla (1) Jose Guillen (3) Jose Mijares (3) Jose Uribe (2) Josh Osich (9) JT Snow (1) Juan Perez (6) Juan Uribe (9) Juggling Monkey (1) Julian Fernandez (7) Julio Urias (1) Jung Hoo Lee (2) jury (1) Just Say No (1) Kelby Tomlinson (5) Kendry Flores (2) Keury Mella (2) Kevin Correia (2) Kevin Frandsen (22) Kevin Gausman (3) Kevin Pillar (2) Kevin Pucetas (10) KNBR (1) Kung Fu Panda (30) Kyle Crick (16) Kyle Harrison (5) laid off (1) Larry Baer (3) Larry Ellison (1) Lead-off (2) leadoff (1) left-handed (1) Lew Wolff (1) LHP (1) Lineup (17) lineup construction (4) Lineup position (1) links (1) Logan Webb (3) Lon Simmons (1) long relief (2) Long-Term Contract (22) long-term planning (3) losing streak (1) Lucius Fox (3) luck (2) Luis Angel Mateo (2) Luis Matos (2) Luis Toribio (1) lunatic fringe (1) Mac Marshall (1) Mac Williamson (12) Madison Bumgarner (185) Mailbox (1) Malcolm Gladwell (1) management change (3) management issues (5) managerial value (5) Manny (1) Marc Kroon (2) Marco Luciano (3) Marco Scutaro (12) Mark DeRosa (8) Mark Gardner (1) Mark Melancon (4) Marlon Byrd (1) Martin Agosta (7) Marvin Miller (1) Masahiro Tanaka (1) Mason Black (1) Mason McVay (1) Matsuzaka (1) Matt Cain (160) Matt Chapman (1) Matt Daniels (3) Matt Downs (2) Matt Duffy (8) Matt Graham (1) Matt Holliday (1) Matt Krook (2) Matt Moore (15) Matt Morris (2) Mauricio Dubon (2) Mechanics (4) Media (17) Media Bias (17) media hypocrisy (1) Media Trade Idea (3) Medical (1) Mediocy (11) Mediots (6) Melk-Gone (1) Melky Cabrera (14) Melvin Adon (1) memories (1) mental (1) Merkin Valdez (8) Message in a Bottle (1) methodology (2) MI (1) Michael Conforto (1) Michael Main (1) Michael Reed (1) Michael Trout (1) middle infield (2) Miguel Cabrera (2) Miguel Gomez (1) Miguel Tejada (5) Mike Fontenot (3) Mike Ivie (1) Mike Kickham (9) Mike Leake (11) Mike Matheny (1) Mike Morse (10) Mike Yazstremski (2) milestone (1) minor league (1) minor league contract (4) minors (11) mismanagement (1) misnomer (1) mistakes (2) MLB (2) MLB stupidity (2) MLB Success (7) MLB Trade Rumors (1) MLBAM (1) MLBTR (1) MLE (1) Mock Draft analysis (8) Modern Portfolio Theory (1) Modus Operandi (2) MPT (1) MVP (2) Natanael Javier (1) Nate Schierholtz (45) Nathanael Javier (1) Nationals (1) Naysayers (2) Negotiations (1) Neil Ramirez (1) NewPQS (8) Next Gen (1) Nick Hundley (2) Nick Noonan (27) Nick Pereira (1) Nick Vander Tuig (2) Nick Vincent (1) NL Champions (2) NL West (29) NL West Division Title (20) NL West Future (1) NLCS (22) NLCS MVP (2) NLDS (8) Noah Lowry (14) non-roster invitees (2) non-tenders (3) Nori Aoki (4) NPB (1) NRI (1) Oakland A's (4) OBP (1) oddities (1) Offense (4) offensive era (1) ogcPQS (6) Omar Vizquel (3) one-run games (3) Opener (1) openers (1) Opening Day (6) opening day pitcher (3) opening day roster (11) Optimism (1) Osiris Matos (2) Outfield (3) overturned (1) Ownership (7) Pablo Sandoval (97) Padres (1) Panda (6) Pandoval (1) passing (1) Pat Burrell (15) Pat Misch (5) Patrick Bailey (2) Payroll (11) PECOTA (1) Pedro Feliz (12) PEDS (10) Perfect Game (2) perjury trial (1) personal (2) Personal Reminiscence (2) Pessimism (1) Pete Palmer (1) Pete Putila (1) Pete Rose (3) Peter Magowan (2) Phil Bickford (3) Phillies (7) philosophy (1) Phoenix Theory of Rebuilding (1) Pierce Johnson (2) Pitch Count (3) pitch framing (1) pitch value (1) Pitcher hitting 8th (1) pitcher’s health (1) Pitchers League (1) Pitching (27) pitching analysis (4) pitching department (1) pitching development (4) Pitching Rotation (90) pitching staff (6) pitching strategy (2) plate discipline (1) platoon players (2) Play Ball (1) player acquisition (1) player budget (2) player development (7) playoff (2) playoff analysis (2) playoff hopes (37) playoff roster (2) playoff rotation (6) Playoff Success (27) Playoff Win Effective (3) Playoff Win Efficient (2) Playoffs (44) postmortem (2) PQS (109) press conference (2) pressure (2) priorities (1) Projected Record (6) projection (2) projections (2) promotion (2) prospect (3) prospect analysis (7) prospect future (1) prospect handling (1) Prospect of Note (3) prospect promotion (1) prospect study (2) Prospects (46) quality starts (1) questions (1) radio great (1) Rafael Rodriquez (8) Rajai Davis (2) Ralph Barbieri (1) Ramon Ramirez (3) Randy Johnson (10) Randy Messenger (2) Randy Winn (14) Rangers (5) Ranking (4) rant (1) raspberry (1) rationalization (1) Ray Durham (5) re-sign (2) realist (1) Rebuilding (5) Rebuilding Myths series (1) rebuttal (1) Red Sox (1) Reds (5) rehab (1) reliever (3) relievers (1) Relocation Concession (2) Research (2) resource scarcity (1) rest for starters (1) Retired (3) Retirement (3) return (1) Reyes Moronta (3) RHP (1) Ricardo Genoves (1) Rich Aurilia (7) Rick Peterson (1) Rickie Weeks (1) Ricky Oropesa (3) right-handed (1) risk mitigation (2) risk profile (1) Roberto Gomez (1) Rockies (2) Rod Beck (1) Roger Kieschnick (13) Roger Metzger (1) Ron Shandler (2) Ron Wotus (1) Ronnie Jebavy (1) Ronnie Ray (1) rookie debut (1) Rookie of the Year (1) Roster (4) rosterbation (2) Rotation by Committee (1) Rotation Chaos (1) ROY (2) Royals (3) Rule 5 (2) Rule 5 Draft Pick (5) rumors (9) run differential (1) run prevention (1) run production (1) runs support (1) Russ Ortiz (11) Russell Carleton (1) Ryan Garko (2) Ryan Klesko (4) Ryan Rohlinger (2) Ryan Theriot (3) Ryan Vogelsong (93) Ryder Jones (2) Sabean Naysayers (7) Sabermetric Thoughts (6) sabermetrics (5) SABR (1) Salary speculation (3) SALLY (1) Sam Dyson (7) Sam Long (1) Sam Selman (1) Sam Wolff (1) San Jose Giants (1) San Jose Relocation (3) Sandro Fabian (2) Sandy Rosario (1) Santiago Casilla (9) scenarios (1) Scott Boras (1) Scott Harris (2) Scott McClain (2) Scott Shuman (1) Scouting (2) Sean Hjelle (5) season review (1) secret sauce (2) Sergio Romo (17) Seth Corry (6) SF Giants (2) Shilo McCall (1) Shohei Ohtani (3) Shohei Otani (2) Shooter (1) shutouts (1) Signature Song (1) signing (13) Silly-Ball (3) South Atlantic League (1) South Bay Rights (1) SP usage (1) spin rate (1) splits (2) Sports Illustrated (1) Spring Training (16) stabilized stats (1) standings (1) starting CF (1) starting lineup (19) starting pitching (96) starting rotation (4) Statcorner (1) State of the Giants (1) statistics (2) STATS (1) Steamer (1) Stephen Vogt (1) Steroids (7) Steve Edlefsen (4) Steve Johnson (3) Steve Okert (8) Steven Duggar (7) strikeout rate (2) Sue Burns (1) sunk costs (1) superstition (1) tactics (1) talent evaluation (4) Tax (1) team culture (1) Team of the 2010's (2) Team of the 2020's (1) Team of the Decade (4) Team Speed (1) Team Support (1) Thank You (2) The Evil Ones (tm) (1) The Giants Way (2) The Hardball Times (1) The Hey Series (19) The Hey Zaidi Series (4) Thomas Joseph (3) Thomas Neal (9) Tigers (4) Tim Alderson (17) Tim Hudson (39) Tim Lincecum (195) TINSTAAPP (1) Todd Linden (3) Todd Wellemeyer (6) Tommy Joseph (3) Tony Watson (4) Top 100 Prospects (1) Top 14 Roster (1) Top Draft Position (4) top Giants prospects (5) top player list (1) top prospect list (6) Trade (12) Trade Analysis (22) Trade Idea (9) Trade PTBNL (2) Trade Rumors (30) trading (1) training staff (2) Training Tool (1) Travis Blackley (1) Travis Ishikawa (47) Trevor Brown (5) Trevor Gott (1) tribute (1) Tristan Beck (2) turning point (1) Ty Blach (23) Tyler Austin (1) Tyler Beede (10) Tyler Cyr (1) Tyler Horan (1) Tyler McDonald (1) Tyler Rogers (2) Tyler Walker (2) umpire mistake (3) Umpires (3) USA Today (1) utility (1) Voros McCracken (1) Waiver Roulette (1) Waldis Joaquin (5) walks (1) Wall of Fame (1) WAR (4) Warrior Spirit (1) Wendell Fairley (10) What-If Scenario (3) wild card (1) wild card race (1) Will Bednar (1) Will Clark (1) Will Smith (7) Will Wilson (3) Williams Jerez (1) Willie Mac Award (1) Willie Mays (1) winning on the road (1) Winter League (1) winter meetings (3) World Series (28) World Series Champions (13) WS Ring Bling (1) xBABIP (1) xwOBA (1) Yankees (1) Yusmeiro Petit (40) Zack Cozart (2) Zack Wheeler (9) Zaidi MO (2) Zaidi Rotation (3) ZiPS (1) Zito Role (2)