Monday, March 20, 2017

Giants and OF: It's a Work in Progress, as Haters Always Hate

I've seen many complaints about the Giants inability to develop outfielders in recent years.  This recent article in the Mercury brought it up again, noting "most of which went sour", and put some data into the conversation, which I've copied here:

Name, Yr. drafted              Draft Rd            SF Years      SF Games Played   OF Starts
Nate Schierholtz (2003)         2 (63)            2007-12                   503                  258
Fred Lewis  (2002)                2 (66)            2006-09                   326                  214
Todd Linden  (2001)             1-s (41)          2003-07                   270                    79
John Bowker  (2004)            3 (100)           2008-10                   183                    46
Dan Ortmeier  (2002)            3 (97)             2005-08                   124                    33
Jarrett Parker (2010)             2 (74)             2015-current              84                    39
Mac Williamson (2012)          3 (115)          2015-current              64                    35
Roger Kieschnick  (2008)       3 (82)            2013                           38                    21
Gary Brown  (2010)               1 (24)            2014                             7                      1
Wendell Fairley (2007)            1 (29)              —                              0                      0
Eddie Martinez-Esteve (2004)  2 (70)            —                              0                      0
Dylan Davis   (2014)               3 (87)           Still in system
Bryan Reynolds  (2016)           2 (59)          Still in system
Heath Quinn (2016)                 3 (95)           Still in system

ogc thoughts

First off, I would note that the level of conversation regarding the Giants, i.e. Sabean, and the draft has been narrowing over the years.   First, it was that he didn't know how to draft.  I was one of those, and that sparked me to research it (see the study I produced on that here) and discover that the Giants were no more worse or better than teams that were considered good at drafting, and then I researched the draft itself and found that it is extremely hard to find a good baseball player even in the first round.  Since then, I have been a fervent Sabean supporter, garnering the enmity of other Giants fans who fervently disagreed.  They particularly didn't like it much when I would jump in and be thankful that Sabean got another two year extension while over 99.9999% of the comments in the thread where aghast that he was signed again.

Once he started getting success (which I had found in my study to be more likely once we started losing), then the Naysayers had to back off of their statements.   Once Cain and especially Lincecum came to the fore, they couldn't say that he can't draft and develop starting pitchers.  Romo killed any mention of relief pitchers.  They moved on to position players, and Posey killed that one.  Then Belt and Crawford killed the thought that the Giants couldn't develop middle infielders or corner infielders.  So that left outfielders to hang their hate on (and lately, the conversation has turned back again that Giants can't develop starting pitchers, since Bumgarner was the last one in 2010).

Research Says:  It's a Work in Progress Because Context Matters

I understand why people have problems believing that Sabean has actually been good with the draft.  The problem is that the odds are so bad even in the first round.  Look at the study I did on the draft that is linked above.  Here are the key results I want to point out here (where a good player was defined as a player providing roughly 6 years worth of good production, either .295+ BA or 3.30- ERA; best data available online at that time; I've been hoping to update using WAR):
Star/Good: The data grouped into these sets: 1-5, 6-20, 21-30, 31-90, 91-100. The percentage of picks in each set, respectively, are: 43.1%, 18.5%, 10.8%, 4.0%, and 1.5%.
So beyond the first five picks of the draft, the odds drop precipitously on finding at least a good player, even worse than the Mendoza Line, and once you get to the draft position where playoff contenders usually get, it just gets exponentially worse from there.  By around the end of the third round (depends on how many supplemental picks are awarded), picks 91-100 become a good player or better only 1.5% of the time, per my study's results.

So while the Giants picks have gone sour, the odds are that they will.  The highest pick spent on an OF was 24 for Gary Brown, and even there the odds were around 11%.  You would have to pick around 9 Gary Browns to get to the point where you wonder if the drafter is any good, though as we'll see later, even then, maybe not.

Meanwhile, the Giants have spent their best draft bullets on these players:  Posey (5th pick), Wheeler (6th), Lincecum (10th), Bumgarner (10th).  As you can see, when you have better odds of finding a good player, your results look pretty good (and I would note that this string of picks was probably historically good in terms of impact).  And when teams on average don't do so well in finding good players, then your chances of bucking the odds are pretty low as well.

Understanding the Implications of Such Low Draft Probabilities

One way of judging how good a team or GM has been with their draft picks would be to add up the percentages in the study's results above.  Thus, we would count 4% for the Schierholtz pick, 1.5% for Bowker, 11% for Fairley, and so on.  Doing this, the total for the players drafted above equal 60.0%.

What does this mean?  It means that if you were able to replicate this an infinity number of times, with a similar set of players drafted each time, 60% of the time the drafted players will yield a good player.  Thus, even though 14 players were drafted, the odds were not much better than a coin flip, the drafter would need to draft another similar set of players another 9-10 times in order to get to 100% No wonder so many of them has gone sour!

Of course, I should note here that reach 100% does not guarantee you that you will find a good player after that many picks.  It is like rolling dice and counting up each time a certain number comes up.  If you do it a significant number of times, you will find that a 7 will come up 16.667% of the time (or 1 out of 6) but if you try 36 throws of the dice, while 7 be rolled 6 times often, there will be many times where your "luck" is bad and randomness wins the day and you might end up with nothing.

With the draft, a similar concept holds.  Sabean and gang could draft another 10 outfielders in the same range of the draft and it would still be within the bounds of randomness that he won't find a good starting outfielder and it don't mean that he's not good at drafting.  For example, let's say Sabean ends up getting the 21st pick for the next 9 years/drafts and use 11% as the proportion of picks that become a good player.  In 9 years, that works out to roughly 100%.  39% of the time, he would find one good OF.  And 26% of the time he will end up with more than one good OF.  However, 35% of the time he would end up with not even one good OF, and yet he could be performing at average.  In other words, over a third of the time, he could still find no good OF and could still be good, just unlucky.

Haters Gonna Hate

So how people come across when they look at the draft tells me a lot about their preconceived thoughts about the GM.  If they just love the GM, they will just say he's great, look at the rings and bow.   If they don't care for the GM, they will point out any negative that they can find about his drafting.

Hence the sequence over the years - "He's horrible drafting..." "He can't draft position players..." "He can't draft middle infielders..." "He can't draft outfielders..." and now they are cycling back to "He can't draft pitchers...".  Or they would point out all the bad trades, ignoring the fact that it didn't cost us anything much in terms of prospects to pick up the guy, and more importantly, not properly weighting the impact of trades (yes, GM's do make mistakes, but if he picks up great guys regularly, that should get extra weight).

And Generalists Gonna Be Too General

And sometimes, they just don't know enough to say, but say it anyway because the demands of the job require it.  That is why my stance has been that the best analysis you are going to find about any particular team is going to be done by people who are focused on that team, because they care about the minutia about the team, whereas the generalists just don't have that breadth of knowledge about the team.

And the author of the article that started this blog post, he's both a generalist (worse, he followed the other Bay Area team for many years) and a hater (he's always been rough on the Giants over the years).  He's a smart guy, but out of his depths when throw in by his editor to write on the Giants.  And if he's not a hater, he's worse:  a writer who don't know what he's writing about.

GM Analysis

This is why I've been saying for over ten years now that one can't look at draft results and say whether the GM is good or not.  Especially not within the lifetime of most GM's, because they often don't last very long at the job.  Especially since, once you get past the first 5-10 picks of the draft, it takes the rest of the players 4-6 years just to make the majors, let alone start to produce and demonstrate how good they are.  The odds against and the length of time just to make the majors and be good just makes it basically impossible.

This is also why I've been saying for over ten years that no GM should hope to build a team from only home grown players (and thus no fan should denigrate a GM for not building a team with only homegrown players; in this case, the fan's hate is showing, no team has ever built entirely with homegrown and won).  It is hard enough just to find good players for any particular position, based on the poor odds of finding good players, and thus almost impossible to try to game the randomness and find and fill a specific position.   One should celebrate the wins (when there are enough of them) and not get so hung up on filling any one position or grouped positions.

This is why I wrote in my business plan series about how the best way to build up a team from scratch is to focus most of your top picks and the majority of your picks overall on pitchers, because the cream will rise to the top, as there are 13 positions related to pitchers, and with each good pitcher you find, you can fill out the rotation, as well as the bullpen.  And while you keep the cream, the middle tier is also great for trading for the pieces you need.

Which is how you can build out a team beyond the home grown good players.  And trading is the third leg of the system that has to be done well.  And the skill involved with that is also shown by picking up minor league free agents who can contribute to the team at a cheap salary.

That's why I think the best way to evaluate a GM is looking for some key features of his team.  First of all, he has a lot of homegrown good starters (above 2 WAR), more than other playoff competitive teams.  That, to me, is a sign of a good drafter, that he's able to find a lot of good starters through the draft, relative to the league. Secondly, he's capable enough to fill in the rest of the roster, within the limitations of the budget and trading/free agency, such that the team is good enough to make the playoffs for many years, while they are together.  And to win it all, while doing all the above.

Giants and OF

So the outfield is a work in progress.  While it seems like we have drafted a lot of them with high draft picks, the fact is that it exponentially hard to find and draft players via the draft, and the Giants have just not devoted many higher draft picks on the OF.   Pitchers yes, catchers too, and shortstops as well.   These are often players who can move into multiple spots in any 25-man roster.

We have a number of interesting OF prospects, and calling the results sour just reflects the record to now.   A while back, they could (and did) complain about the draft, only for the Giants to develop someone to make the complaint moot. As the Mercury's companion article noted, their drought might be over, with Parker and Williamson both battling it out for the LF starting position, and both doing so well so far.  And as well, Davis, Reynolds, and Quinn are interesting prospects with potential.

I'm not too worried about the OF.  We have a number of interesting prospects there but it is just so tough to make the majors.  More importantly to me, we have at least a couple of players who look like they will be good starters in the majors in Tyler Beede and Christian Arroyo.


  1. Too busy to research it, but it seems to me that there were more a few other outfielders in our system that played a few cames here and there that were drafted in our system.

    1. You are right, and that is because the author focused only on the top draft picks, I think the first 3 rounds, for this article.

      He did not state, but the thinking probably was along the lines of "beyond the third round, any success is related to luck, not skill", for as I noted, I think his intention was to make Sabean look bad. Or maybe it was more benign and he didn't want this huge list taking up space. Or a combo of both.

  2. The Giants haven't spent many high draft picks on the OF, as you say, ogc. I am guessing that the reason for this is that they want to beat the odds that you've presented, therefore to look to the positions where shrewd scouting counts most; and for position players, that means looking to players who excel in the field rather than at the plate. One's arm, one's range, one's agility, one's speed, and one's hands are tested by amateur ball at a level that often approximates the professional level. Smart scouting can assess them well. Hitting against wild, undeveloped arms with narrow pitch repertories would seem to me much harder to assess. It would follow, I would think, that positions where the bat is more crucial--corner outfield and first base--would be harder to predict success in, whereas those where one can see skills tested by hard-hit balls and tricky fielding chances would be more projectible from high-school or college ball into pro ball. It's not an accident that the Giants have great defensive teams of home-grown players, but the result of smart drafting based on smart scouting, so as to overcome the draft odds that you present.

    1. Yes, good points, as usual, campanari. Thanks for sharing!

      Yeah, one reason was the strong focus on pitching pre-Barr with the top picks. Before him, almost every first round pick since Sabean's first draft (or two) were for pitchers. Since Barr joined, it has been almost alternating between position and pitching, and as noted, it takes a good number of years to see if there is success or failure.



1984 Draft (1) 2007 Draft (15) 2007 Giants (52) 2008 Draft (22) 2008 Giants (53) 2008 season (6) 2009 Draft (18) 2009 Giants (87) 2009 season (24) 2010 Decade (12) 2010 Draft (11) 2010 Giants (137) 2010 NL ROY award (1) 2010 season (19) 2010's (3) 2011 Draft (9) 2011 Giants (84) 2011 season (8) 2012 Draft (11) 2012 Giants (93) 2012 season (11) 2013 Draft (3) 2013 Giants (39) 2013 season (5) 2014 (1) 2014 draft (5) 2014 Giants (79) 2014 season (16) 2015 Draft (4) 2015 Giants (50) 2015 season (10) 2016 Draft (1) 2016 Giants (45) 2016 season (5) 2017 Giants (14) 25 man roster (10) 25th man fallacy (1) 3B (1) 40 Man Roster (8) 49ers (1) 6-man rotation (3) 89 Quake (1) 89 World Series (1) A-Ball (1) A-Gon (1) A-Rod (3) A's (6) AA-Ball (1) Aaron Rowand (25) accomplishments (1) ace pitcher (1) Adalberto Mejia (6) Adam Duvall (5) AFL (4) Albert Suarez (4) Alex Hinshaw (3) Alex Pavlovic (1) All-Star Game (1) almost perfect game (1) Amphetamine (2) analysis (19) Andre Torres (14) Andres Torres (2) Andrew Suarez (1) Andrew Susac (11) Andy Baggerly (2) Andy Sisco (1) Angel Joseph (1) Angel Pagan (17) Angel Villalona (30) Anniversary (1) appendicitis (1) Aramis Garcia (1) Arbitration (17) Armando Benitez (5) Armando Gallaraga (1) art of failure (1) Asia-Pacific signing (1) assessment (1) At the Rate They Are Going (1) ATT Park (1) Aubrey Huff (20) Award (4) BABIP (3) Barry Bonds (30) Barry Zito (77) baseball (1) Baseball America (2) Baseball Prospectus (3) Baseball Prospectus Bias Against Giants (3) baseball strategy (6) Baseball Study (17) baserunning (2) batting peripherals (1) batting stance analysis (1) batting title champion (1) Beat LA (8) bench players (4) Bengie Molina (14) Benjamin Snyder (1) Bert Blyleven (1) best manager (1) best practices (2) Beyond the Box Score (1) Bias Against Giants (1) Big 6 (8) Bill Hall (1) Bill James (1) Bill James Handbook (2) Bill Mueller (1) Bill Neukom (21) Billy Beane (3) Blog Philosophy (2) Bob Howry (2) Bob Mariano (1) Bobby Evans (2) Boston Red Sox (1) Brad Hennessey (5) Brad Penny (2) Brandon Bednar (1) Brandon Belt (47) Brandon Crawford (24) Brandon Hicks (1) Braves (5) breakout (2) Brett Bochy (4) Brett Pill (9) Brian Anderson (1) Brian Bocock (2) Brian Cooper (1) Brian Horwitz (3) Brian Ragira (2) Brian Sabean (45) Brian Wilson (14) Bridegrooms (6) Bruce Bochy (29) Bucky Showalter (1) bulllpen (2) Bullpen (29) Business Plan (13) Buster Posey (98) Byran Reynolds (1) Byung-Hyun Kim (1) Cained (4) call-ups (3) Candlestick Park (1) Cards (13) Career Prospects (4) Carl Hubbell (1) Carlos Beltran (4) Carlos Gomez (1) Carney Lansford (2) Carter Jurica (1) Casey McGeHee (3) catcher injury (5) catching (2) CC Sabathia (1) censorship (2) CEO (2) Chad Gaudin (5) Charles Culberson (5) Charlie Culberson (3) Chase Johnson (3) Chillax (1) Chris Brown (1) Chris Gloor (1) Chris Heston (18) Chris Lincecum (1) Chris Marrero (1) Chris O'Leary (1) Chris Ray (4) Chris Shaw (1) Chris Stewart (4) Chris Stratton (10) Christian Arroyo (5) Christmas (1) Christopher Dominguez (4) Christy Mathewson (1) Chuckie Jones (2) Clay Hensley (3) Clayton Blackburn (10) Clayton Tanner (3) Closer (8) closer by committee (3) Coaches (3) Cody Hall (2) Cody Ross (8) Col (1) Comeback Award (1) Commissioner (1) comparison (1) competitive advantage (1) Competitive Balance Tax (2) competitiveness (1) Conor Gillaspie (25) contender (1) contract extension (3) contract negotiations (2) contract signing (6) core competency (1) Cory Gearrin (2) Cory Guerrin (1) Cory Hart (1) Craig Whitaker (2) cuts (1) Cy Young Award (5) D-backs (15) D-gers (36) D-Rocks (3) D-Rox (17) Dallas McPherson (1) Dan Ortmeier (11) Dan Otero (2) Dan Runzler (6) Dan Slania (1) Dan Uggla (1) Daniel Carbonell (1) Daniel Slania (2) Darren Ford (1) Dave Roberts (11) David Aardsma (1) David Huff (2) David Loewenstein (1) Decade of the Giants (11) decline (1) Defense (8) Deferred Money (1) deleted comment (1) Denard Span (2) depth (1) Derek Law (8) Detroit Tigers (1) DFA (3) DH (2) Dick Tidrow (2) dictionary (1) Dirty (1) DL (2) dodgers (12) Donald Snelten (1) Draft (7) Draft Analysis (14) Draft Bonus (7) draft list (2) draft philosophy (1) draft signing (3) Draft Strategy (11) Draft Study (2) Draft Success (2) drafting (1) Dres (16) DRS (1) Dynasty (1) Edgar Renteria (13) Eduardo Nunez (4) Edwin Escobar (5) Ehire Adrianza (26) Eli Whiteside (4) Elimination game (1) EME (2) Emmanuel Burriss (18) epic season (6) Eric Byrnes (1) Eric Surkamp (6) Erik Cordier (1) Eugenio Velez (12) evaluation (2) extension (7) fan outrage (1) fanfest (1) FanGraphs (2) felony conviction (1) Fielding (4) Fielding Stats (4) finger injury (3) first post-season press conference (2) Francisco Peguero (4) Fred Lewis (3) Freddie Lewis (17) Freddie Sanchez (4) Freddy Sanchez (7) Free Agency (7) Free agent possibilities (20) Free agent signing (13) Free agent signings (21) front office (1) Game Score (3) gamer-tude (1) Gary Brown (25) Geno Espinelli (1) George Kontos (10) Ghosts of Giants Drafts (1) Giants (7) Giants Announcer (1) Giants blogs (3) Giants Chat (4) Giants Defense (1) Giants Draft (11) Giants Drafts (2) Giants Farm System (31) Giants Franchise record (2) Giants Future (64) Giants GM (4) Giants Greats (3) Giants hitting manual (1) Giants No-Hitter (5) Giants Offense (27) Giants Offseason (21) Giants Pitching (3) Giants Strategy (35) GiDar (1) Gino Espinelli (1) glossary (1) Gold Glove Award (1) good will (1) Gorkys Hernandez (1) Graphical Player (1) Gregor Blanco (15) Gregor Moscoso (1) Guillermo Moscoso (2) Guillermo Mota (2) Guillermo Quiroz (1) Gustavo Cabrera (4) Hall of Fame (9) Hall of Shame (4) Hank Aaron (5) Happy Holidays (2) Hate mail (1) heart-warming (1) Heath Hembree (8) Heath Quinn (1) Hector Correa (1) Hector Sanchez (11) Henry Sosa (8) HGH (1) Hidden Game (1) high expectations (1) high school focus in draft (1) high velocity hitters (1) high velocity pitchers (1) Hitter's League (1) Hitting (17) Hitting Coach (1) hitting mechanics (3) hitting pitchers (2) hitting streak (1) Hitting; (1) Home Run Career Record (7) Home Run Hitting Contest (1) Hunter Pence (23) Hunter Stickland (1) Hunter Strickland (4) Ian Gardeck (1) Idea (4) IFA (1) improvement (2) Indictment (1) injury (3) instant replay (2) instructor (1) Interesting Question (1) International Free Agent Pursuits (3) International Signings (5) interview (3) Investment (1) Ivan Ochoa (2) J2 (1) Jack Taschner (4) Jackson Williams (3) Jacob Dunnington (1) Jacob McCasland (1) Jae-gyun Hwang (1) Jake Dunning (2) Jake Peavy (39) Jake Smith (1) Jalen Miller (1) Japanese Starters (1) Jarrett Parker (8) Jason Heyward (1) Jason Maxwell (2) Jason Stoffel (1) Javier Lopez (5) JC Gutierrez (3) Jean Machi (6) Jeff Kent (1) Jeff Samardzija (13) Jeff Suppan (1) Jeremy Affeldt (12) Jeremy Shelley (2) Jerome Williams (1) Jesse English (2) Jesse Foppert (1) Jesus Guzman (4) Jimmy Rollins (1) Joaquin Arias (14) Joe Panik (14) Joe Torre (1) Joey Martinez (2) Johan Santana (1) John Barr (1) John Bowker (22) John Thorn (1) Johneshwy Fargas (2) Johnny Bench (1) Johnny Cueto (14) Johnny Monell (1) Johnny Rucker (1) Jonah Arenado (1) Jonathan Mayo (1) Jonathan Sanchez (49) Jordan Johnson (1) Jose Canseco (1) Jose Casilla (1) Jose Guillen (3) Jose Mijares (3) Jose Uribe (2) Josh Osich (5) JT Snow (1) Juan Perez (6) Juan Uribe (9) Juggling Monkey (1) Julio Urias (1) jury (1) Just Say No (1) Kelby Tomlinson (4) Kendry Flores (2) Keury Mella (2) Kevin Correia (2) Kevin Frandsen (22) Kevin Pucetas (10) KNBR (1) Kung Fu Panda (30) Kyle Crick (14) Larry Baer (2) Larry Ellison (1) Lead-off (2) leadoff (1) left-handed (1) Lew Wolff (1) LHP (1) Lineup (17) lineup construction (3) Lineup position (1) links (1) Lon Simmons (1) long relief (1) Long-Term Contract (22) long-term planning (3) losing streak (1) Lucius Fox (3) luck (2) Luis Angel Mateo (2) lunatic fringe (1) Mac Marshall (1) Mac Williamson (8) Madison Bumgarner (164) Mailbox (1) Malcolm Gladwell (1) management change (3) management issues (5) managerial value (4) Manny (1) Marc Kroon (2) Marco Scutaro (12) Mark DeRosa (8) Mark Melancon (1) Marlon Byrd (1) Martin Agosta (7) Marvin Miller (1) Masahiro Tanaka (1) Mason McVay (1) Matsuzaka (1) Matt Cain (153) Matt Downs (2) Matt Duffy (8) Matt Graham (1) Matt Holliday (1) Matt Krook (1) Matt Moore (7) Matt Morris (2) Mechanics (4) Media (16) Media Bias (17) Media Trade Idea (3) Medical (1) Mediocy (10) Mediots (4) Melk-Gone (1) Melky Cabrera (14) memories (1) mental (1) Merkin Valdez (8) Message in a Bottle (1) methodology (2) MI (1) Michael Main (1) Michael Trout (1) middle infield (1) Miguel Cabrera (2) Miguel Gomez (1) Miguel Tejada (5) Mike Fontenot (3) Mike Ivie (1) Mike Kickham (9) Mike Leake (11) Mike Matheny (1) Mike Morse (10) milestone (1) minor league (1) minor league contract (2) minors (11) mismanagement (1) misnomer (1) mistakes (2) MLB (2) MLB stupidity (2) MLB Success (7) MLB Trade Rumors (1) MLBAM (1) MLBTR (1) MLE (1) Mock Draft analysis (6) MVP (2) Natanael Javier (1) Nate Schierholtz (45) Nathanael Javier (1) Nationals (1) Naysayers (1) Negotiations (1) Neil Ramirez (1) Next Gen (1) Nick Hundley (1) Nick Noonan (27) Nick Pereira (1) Nick Vander Tuig (2) NL Champions (2) NL West (23) NL West Division Title (17) NL West Future (1) NLCS (22) NLCS MVP (2) NLDS (8) Noah Lowry (14) non-roster invitees (1) non-tenders (2) Nori Aoki (4) NPB (1) Oakland A's (4) OBP (1) oddities (1) Offense (3) offensive era (1) Omar Vizquel (3) one-run games (3) Opening Day (5) opening day pitcher (3) opening day roster (9) Optimism (1) Osiris Matos (2) Outfield (2) overturned (1) Ownership (7) Pablo Sandoval (92) Padres (1) Panda (6) Pandoval (1) passing (1) Pat Burrell (15) Pat Misch (5) Payroll (10) Pedro Feliz (12) PEDS (10) Perfect Game (2) perjury trial (1) Personal Reminiscence (2) Pessimism (1) Pete Palmer (1) Pete Rose (3) Peter Magowan (2) Phil Bickford (3) Phillies (7) philosophy (1) Phoenix Theory of Rebuilding (1) Pitch Count (3) pitch value (1) Pitcher hitting 8th (1) Pitchers League (1) Pitching (19) Pitching Rotation (71) pitching staff (5) plate discipline (1) platoon players (1) Play Ball (1) player budget (2) player development (2) playoff (2) playoff hopes (35) playoff roster (2) playoff rotation (5) Playoff Success (21) Playoffs (40) postmortem (1) PQS (91) press conference (2) pressure (2) priorities (1) Projected Record (6) projection (2) projections (2) promotion (2) prospect (3) prospect analysis (4) prospect handling (1) Prospect of Note (3) prospect study (1) Prospects (44) quality starts (1) questions (1) radio great (1) Rafael Rodriquez (8) Rajai Davis (2) Ralph Barbieri (1) Ramon Ramirez (3) Randy Johnson (10) Randy Messenger (2) Randy Winn (14) Rangers (5) Ranking (4) raspberry (1) Ray Durham (5) re-sign (2) Rebuilding (4) Rebuilding Myths series (1) rebuttal (1) Reds (5) Relocation Concession (2) Research (2) resource scarcity (1) rest for starters (1) Retired (3) Retirement (1) return (1) Reyes Moronta (1) RHP (1) Rich Aurilia (7) Rick Peterson (1) Rickie Weeks (1) Ricky Oropesa (3) right-handed (1) risk mitigation (2) risk profile (1) Rockies (1) Rod Beck (1) Roger Kieschnick (13) Roger Metzger (1) Ron Shandler (2) Ronnie Jebavy (1) Rookie of the Year (1) Roster (4) rosterbation (2) ROY (2) Royals (3) Rule 5 (1) Rule 5 Draft Pick (3) rumors (9) run production (1) runs support (1) Russ Ortiz (11) Ryan Garko (2) Ryan Klesko (4) Ryan Rohlinger (2) Ryan Theriot (3) Ryan Vogelsong (93) Ryder Jones (2) Sabean Naysayers (6) Sabermetric Thoughts (6) sabermetrics (4) SABR (1) Salary speculation (3) SALLY (1) San Jose Giants (1) San Jose Relocation (3) Sandy Rosario (1) Santiago Casilla (9) Scott McClain (2) Scott Shuman (1) Scouting (1) secret sauce (1) Sergio Romo (17) SF Giants (2) Shilo McCall (1) Shooter (1) shutouts (1) Signature Song (1) signing (13) Silly-Ball (3) South Atlantic League (1) South Bay Rights (1) SP usage (1) splits (2) Spring Training (16) standings (1) starting lineup (18) starting pitching (70) Statcorner (1) statistics (2) STATS (1) Steamer (1) Steroids (6) Steve Edlefsen (4) Steve Johnson (3) Steve Okert (6) strikeout rate (1) Sue Burns (1) sunk costs (1) superstition (1) Tax (1) team culture (1) Team of the 2010's (1) Team of the Decade (3) Team Speed (1) Team Support (1) Thank You (1) The Evil Ones (tm) (1) The Giants Way (1) The Hardball Times (1) The Hey Series (15) Thomas Joseph (3) Thomas Neal (9) Tigers (4) Tim Alderson (17) Tim Hudson (39) Tim Lincecum (194) Todd Linden (3) Todd Wellemeyer (6) Tommy Joseph (3) top prospect list (4) Trade (11) Trade Analysis (17) Trade Idea (8) Trade PTBNL (2) Trade Rumors (30) trading (1) training staff (2) Training Tool (1) Travis Blackley (1) Travis Ishikawa (47) Trevor Brown (4) turning point (1) Ty Blach (6) Tyler Beede (5) Tyler Horan (1) Tyler Rogers (1) Tyler Walker (2) umpire mistake (3) Umpires (3) USA Today (1) utility (1) Voros McCracken (1) Waldis Joaquin (5) walks (1) Wall of Fame (1) WAR (1) Warrior Spirit (1) Wendell Fairley (10) What-If Scenario (3) wild card (1) wild card race (1) Will Clark (1) Will Smith (3) Willie Mac Award (1) Willie Mays (1) winning on the road (1) Winter League (1) winter meetings (1) World Series (26) World Series Champions (11) WS Ring Bling (1) xBABIP (1) Yusmeiro Petit (40) Zack Wheeler (9) ZiPS (1)