According to a recent rumor, the Giants were at an Indians/White Sox game scouting Jermaine Dye and Victor Martinez. I answered the V-Mart trade possibilities on Lefty, and here is basically what I wrote there:
I think V-Mart would require Posey or Bumgarner in the deal, ultimately. The Indians are not in a position of dumping guys just to get salary off their roster, they will only make a deal that gets them ready to battle in 2010, after all, they got Grady Sizemore still on the team. I don't think a package led by Alderson would do it for the Indians.
Look at last year's trade. About half a year of Sabathia (V-Mart has additional year), and the Brewers sent their #1 prospect, Matt LaPorta, plus #11 Bryson and #24 Brantley and Zach Jackson, who was #16 the year before. For comparison, the Giants equivalent would be #1 Bumgarner, #11 Waldis Joaquin (or they might want #13 Henry Sosa), #24 Matt Downs (or they might want #23 Thomas Neal), and last years #16 Nick Pereira (or this year's #15 Kevin Pucetas or #17 Travis Ishikawa).
Given their #1 prospect is a C, and looking over this list, plus fact that V-Mart is signed for another year, I think Bumgarner, Ishikawa (to replace V-Mart at 1B, platoon with Garko, perfect), Pucetas, and probably someone like Scott Barnes, would be what they are looking for in a package from us for V-Mart, based on what they got for Sabathia.
I know V-Mart is no Sabathia, but it's 1.5 years of low cost V-Mart vs. 0.5 years of CC, he plays both C and 1B, switch-hitter, might be able to sign him long term (Nero is agent, not Boras, not sure what that means), excellent hitter, hit same at home as on the road, power, he's in his prime, 30 this year.
Dye is a good hitter, but one must remember that he hits much better at home than on the road. In addition, he has played RF predominantly during his career, and his defense in RF is atrotious, costing 1.5 games per 150 games, a particularly bad trait to have with the Giants funky RF shape. Plus, then he would take away Schierholtz's only position, and put Winn in LF.
Giants Thoughts
Since Sabean and the Giants rarely give any information out, I think that the observers who saw the Giants at this game assumed that the Giants are looking only for a power hitter and then threw out the obvious names, like V-Mart and Dye. Neither fits because the Giants are not willing to trade what it would take to get V-Mart, and Dye don't fit our roster, though Sabean has always said that he would make the trade first, then figure out the ramifications later. And they could always play Dye in LF, but defense would be a problem there as well.
I think the Giants are looking instead for MI players, like Jhonny Peralta and Josh Barfield, who can play 2B. Barfield is extraneous to them now, a big bust of a trade, and they moved Peralta to 3B to play someone else at SS, plus Peralta will be a free agent, I think, at the end of next year. Barfield should not cost as much to get, but Peralta would be more likely to be good for us in 2009-2011 (contract has option to 2011, total of $14M over next 2.5 years) and hits for some power. He would probably cost us an Alderson, but not much more I think in top prospects, but probably would have to throw in another starter, Pucetas, Tanner. If Sadowski can keep on pitching well, they might take him.
In the ChiSox case, I would be interested in Wilson Betemit. Could play 2B, SS, 3B, totally wasted by Yankees and now ChiSox, had a lot of power playing in Atlanta and LA. Should not take much to take him off their hands and he's still young. They already have a nice SS in Ramirez plus Gordon Beckham could play the same positions as well and would take a starting position. Probably would take a mid-tier pitching prospect, I would think, Pucetas, Tanner, Martinez, Sadowski.
Maybe the tribe would be willing to deal Barfield for someone like Bocock or a prospect we have who has worn out his welcome. No one comes to mind immediately...
ReplyDeleteBetemit is an interesting buy-low option, but he really shouldn't be playing any defense position for any team. His UZR numbers are all around ugly.
ReplyDeleteChris, yes, but I was thinking of him like a buy-low version of Uggla.
ReplyDeleteUggla isn't that great at 2B (though that one outlier season), about as bad as Betemit was playing SS, his natural position if I remember right.
I wonder if playing him regularly at 2B could get his defense to at least match what he had done at SS, which then would allow his bat to play well at 2B, I think.
I still prefer starting Frandsen for the rest of the season, but given the Giants talk about buying without giving up key talents, I think it is MI players the Giants are looking at in the Indians-ChiSox game, and these are the ones I think would most interest the Giants relative to that strategy, as both V-Mart and Dye will probably cost the Giants a good prospect. I don't see the Giants overpaying to get a player right now, not with the team playing so well.
Remember, since the Giants pitching got themselves settled down starting April 17 (ironically started by Sanchez), the Giants have been 40-27, .597 winning percentage. If they can continue that for rest of the season, they will end up with 93 wins.
They were even better in June. No June Swoon for the Giants this season, they went 17-10 for their first month significantly above .500 since September 2004. The best month in between was when they went 15-13 in September 2005 and in August 2006, 13-11 in April 2006 and April 2007.
So while it is obvious that a proven hitter would be nice, the Giants have been doing well and that should temper any thoughts of making a big trade to help the ballclub.
The young players appear to have settled down and started providing the power that was hoped for before the season started. In June's 27 games, the Giants hit 25 homeruns, which is a great rate, a 150 HR season extended over a full season. This after 14 HR in 29 games in May and 12 HR in 20 games in April.
So I don't see the Giants wanting to upset the young players who have been contributing to that, meaning Sandoval, Ishikawa, and Schierholtz. That leaves 2B as a key area to acquire a better power source. Peralta would appear to be the best choice for that, but Betemit might be more affordable and roughly equivalent.
you make an awful lot of good points here. Come take a look at my blog I get tons of traffic/comments and would appreciate linking with you if you like my site.
ReplyDeleteoneflapdown77.blogspot.com