As all the whispers and tweets have intimated, Pablo Sandoval has signed with the Giants on a minor league contract, after being dumped by the Red Sox, with one of the largest owed amounts left on a contract ever. He will start off with San Jose to DH one game, then head over to AAA Sacramento to play 3B and DH as the Giants try to figure out what he has left.
The reports are that he is now healthy and slimmer (as always, it's all relate for him), and he was contrite in his return, apologizing to anyone and everyone in Giants Nation, though that last ball of the 2014 World Series apparently is not returning rightfully to the Giants (the rumor is that he sold the ball off).
ogc thoughts
Personally, I would not have pursued this. Been there, done that. And words have been said, words that apologies won't really salve and didn't for me. Worse, the ball was not returned, he dissed the franchise and all the fans by reportedly selling it off to someone (perhaps a Royal's fan who burned it; who knows? But he was pretty angry about the Giants back then, so I can see that happening).
That said, I am personally OK about his return, and don't think it's the bad move that some in the media and the fans have painted it. Just because Gillaspie is younger does not mean that he's a better player than Sandoval. Plus Nunez is probably traded, Hwang just got sent back down to AAA because he just hasn't adjusted to playing off the bench and spot starting, Ryder Jones and Christian Arroyo are both injured by HBP, leaving only backups like Calixte and Tomlinson to play 3B. Sandoval could be the replacement without hurting development if he shows anything in the minors.
And, yeah, it don't look good as far as PR goes to invite back with open arms a player who dissed the Giants so badly that not only the bridge is burned but so is the rest of the road back to the Giants. But this is a no-lose situation for the Giants.
If he fails, he stays in the minors, don't cost us a 40-man prospect, nor that much money. Only their dignity takes a hit.
If he plays well enough that the Giants could bring him up, he probably is only coming up if Nunez is gone, and a roster spot is then opened up on the 40-man, as he won't get us a close or great prospect, just an intriguing prospect with a few years to go, like we gave up when we traded for him. He's not coming up unless he's starting, and I can't see the Giants dumping an interesting prospect for nothing if he's not starting.
If he starts for the Giants, and then fails or is just passable, that just makes a bad season worse. That's fine with me, I want to get as good a draft pick next season as possible, a Top 3 ideally, a Top 5 appears to be likely, at worse a Top 10 pick (though that would disappoint me greatly, at this point, I really want a Top 3 pick).
If he starts for the Giants and hits like he used to hit for us, that's found money, and hopefully the Giants can sign him for the next season. If he can keep his weight down and hit the way he can hit, he's worth the money we would have to pay him, which would not be much for 2018 and maybe 2019 too because of how bad he was with Boston. Other teams will either think that he's only good with the Giants or that he was only lucky, and not bother to try signing him on the cheap for 2018. He'll have to prove he's back over a year to get other teams to take strong interest in signing him up for bigger money than the vet minimum, and that pushes it out to at least 2019.
And at this point, I'm only worried about 2018, and there is not a lot that says that 2018 will be that much better than 2017 right now, we need a lot to go good for us to have sufficient hope that 2018 is better. There are a lot of "ifs" involved with us competing for the playoffs in 2018.
Summing up, having a Sandoval who can hit like he did before is a great value to have on our team for 2018, as he won't cost much but would contribute a lot. Having a Sandoval who hit like he did for the Red Sox is a great value to have for getting our team that Top 3 2018 Draft pick.
I understand how some fans can be so passionate about this. But being a GM requires decision makers to be like investors, very dispassionate about decision making. And if one is focused on what makes the Giants better in 2018, then the move makes sense, as it is a no-lose situation, no matter what Sandoval does.
I personally would not have signed him (and that's the emotional side of me), and I will admit that I was going to write a post stating, "No Mas, Por Favor". But now that he's here, I can see the various benefits of having him around (dispassionate side), I won't let my emotions blind me any further as to the merits of the situation. I know that I'm not always right about the Giants moves.
And this is probably the right move for the Giants, given all the benefits I listed above, and I can live with the decision without making a hissy fit, as some have done (particularly one media type who seems to love to take digs at the Giants all the time, most probably because he's followed the A's for so many decades, it is like he's on their payroll; or maybe it's the Stockholm Syndrome). It will certainly be more interesting to follow than how the team has been playing this season.
These are just my opinions. I cannot promise that I will be perfect, but I can promise that I will seek to understand and illuminate whatever moves that the Giants make (my obsession and compulsion). I will share my love of baseball and my passion for the Giants. And I will try to teach, best that I can. Often, I tackle the prevailing mood among Giants fans and see if that is a correct stance, good or bad.
Info on Blog
▼
Saturday, July 22, 2017
Thursday, July 13, 2017
Your 2017 Giants Draft: Some Analysis
I just found time to gather a bunch of data on the 2017 draft, and below are my data and musings.
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
Your 2017 Giants All-Star Break: A Few Eggs, Make Lemonade
What a difference a year makes! A year ago, roughly, at the All-Star Break, the Giants had one of the best records in the MLB. Since then, they have lost 101 games (including the playoffs). My thoughts.
ogc thoughts
After the offense broke out in June of their poor performance in April/May, they returned to the badness of the start of the season. Only Brandon Belt - who somehow always seems to be the whipping horse of Giants fan - produced out the regulars in July, before the break. Everyone else, including Posey (even Slater, before his essentially season ending injury), hit poorly.
The pitching didn't do much better either, not as good as April/May, but at least better than their horrible June. It is like the pitching and hitting just can't do well at the same time. Though at least the offense was great in June, the pitching hasn't really clicked at all during the 2017 season, it has been all relatively bad compared to prior years.
Starting Pitching Been Bad
There are a variety of reasons for that. Of course, the biggest one is that Bumgarner has been out because of his biking injury. Blach has been decent in replacement, but he's been mostly an innings eater, perfect for the back of the rotation, not so much in replacing Bumgarner's normal production. Not that I expected him to be a carbon copy, and a 4.59 ERA is actually decent for a rookie starter, but his great start gave me hope that he might deliver a better performance than this, with a very poor 4.2 K/9.
Cueto No Bueno
Cueto has been bad as well. In a recent interview, he blamed it on him missing most of spring training, and not getting himself ready properly. However, as Bochy noted when given this explanation by beat writers, said that might be true, but we're 3 months into the season now, he should have gotten into playing shape by now. Of course, part of the reason he missed spring training was because he was busy dealing with his ailing father. And he brought his father with him to the States to take care of him still, so perhaps he's still mentally dealing with that, and professional sports is already hard enough to play without distractions, and having a sick family member distract is a very understandable reason, assuming he's still dealing with that issue.
And distraction or lack of focus appears to be part of the answer for Cueto's woes. His K/9 rate is up there with what he's been doing and is above his career numbers, but his walk rate and HR rate are both sky high, among the worse in his career, basically where he was when he first started in the majors. And loss of focus would contribute greatly to a sharp increase in walks (50% higher than in recent years) and homers (also more than 50% higher), as he would make more mistakes into the zone and out of the zone, missing the corners.
Also, maybe he's not as into his "act" on the mound, as he has been in recent years. He clearly had fun with that from what I saw of him previously. Maybe it's not as fun with his father ailing, and he does not put as much effort into it. Whatever the case may be, his 4.51 ERA is barely better than what Blach has contributed, which is nowhere close to what we should be expecting out of him. That not only kills his trade value, which I had been hoping given this season, but increases the odds that he picks up his player's option, which, as much as I loved what he did last season, I did not want to commit that much to him over the next four seasons. Hopefully the break will give his mind the rest he needs to reset and he can start pitching like he can during the rest of July (four starts) and showcase his trade value.
Moore Has Been Less
Moore has had a lost season. He has been up and down, but mostly down, as apparently he has been struggling to thrown his normal repertoire of pitches because he added a cutter since joining the Giants, and that got him out of his normal mechanics enough to throw him off. So he's stopped using that pitch, and has been searching for his former mechanics.
There is already talk among the beats and fans that perhaps the Giants should seriously consider not picking up his option for next season for $9M and instead buy him out for $1M. This is ridiculous, because the assumption underlying that is that he can't even muster up a season like 2016, and unless there is something physically wrong, he should be able to do something like that, which was worth 2.0 BWar, which is worth roughly double the $8M extra we would be paying him for. So the downside is that if he's still bad next season, as long as he can have a bounceback year and get back to a semblance of 2016, he should be able to give us 1.0 BWar, which would be production that matches his cost. It's a risk, but I would take that type of risk, as long as the Giants don't think there is something physically wrong with him.
The Shark Is An Enigma
How does one strike out 9.7 K/9 and only walk 1.1 BB/9 for a stupendously great 9.07 K/BB ratio, and still have an ERA basically the same as Ty Blach, who didn't even strike out half as many, while walking more? 4.58 ERA is not what one would expect.
The homers are doing him in, as he has a career high (as a starter) 1.4 HR/9 going this season, and much like his lost season with the White Sox, the homers appear to be doing in his ERA. His H/9 is also high, so apparently when he's not striking out guys, they are making very good contact with his pitches. His BABIP is a sky high .327, and that is his high for his career, worse since his first season as a starter.
Not only that, but hitters are hitting him like a power hitter, as overall, his ISO for hitters is 198. That is just too many mistakes going into the hitters' wheelhouse. There is no good reason for hitters to be hitting him that well.
I assume this is still part of the adjustments Samardzija has been making with the Giants Pitching Brain Trust. When you are learning, you tend to make more mistakes, and it seems to me that was what was affecting him a lot with the White Sox, as they worked a lot with him too. I thought that he made a lot of progress last season, and the great K/BB ratio suggests that he's still working on other lessons given him this season, with the poor ERA a sign that he's still struggling with parts of those lessons.
Looking at his game by game stats, there seems to be three distinct phases:
Admittedly, very small samples, but still, they represent three different results. In Phase 1, he was doing his thing and it wasn't working well. In Phase 2, he was able to get his control and command down pretty well, but kept on missing badly on occasion, when the hitter would make him pay, with with so few runners on, not many runs scored. In Phase 3, it appears that he adjusted his style to strikeout less guys in order to induce less contact, which worked in reducing his BABIP down to the normal mean, but ended up with him giving up even more homers. If it was just the hitters adjusting to him, then I would think that his BABIP would have gotten worse.
Hopefully Phase 4 begins after the ASB. The coaches will break down what's working and what's not, and he will clear his mind of some of the clutter of the season. I would just let him continue doing what he was doing when he was going good and work from there, letting him consolidate the learning of this season, and stop changing him, which will only lead to more mistakes.
As I discussed when we first signed him, I view the signings of him and Cueto as a pair of matching bookends. Cueto is the co-ace to pair up with Bumgarner for the first two seasons, while the Giants work on Samardzija to get him up to ace level performance. As much as we are paying him, salaries in baseball today is such that we are only paying him for slightly better than average WAR production, roughly short of 2.5 WAR, which he more than delivered last season, and is falling short of this season, but over the two seasons, should be pretty close to break even.
I was hoping for quicker results, but I guess the Brain Trust had its work cut out with the Shark. Still, we have some time still, the rest of this season, for him to figure things out going forward. That's why I'm against any of the talk about trading him off. They seem to be getting close to figuring him out, and just need to fine tune some things to get him there.
And there is no rush to get rid of him either, we will still need him in future seasons, as even if Cueto opts to stay, Cain will be leaving the rotation before the 2018 season, and perhaps soon, and Beede has been having growing pains in AAA this season, leaving Blach as the only alternative there, unless Suarez can continue to develop. If Samardzija is traded, that's two rotation spots we need to fill, and if Cueto does decide to opt out (ominous that he complained about the lack of Latin players on the roster; ironic as there was plenty not that long ago), that would be three spots.
Thus, I don't see how the Giants can trade off either of Moore or Samardzija, as some have suggested, that's just too many rotation spots filled with question marks, and even if they could sign a free agent, they will have great leverage on the Giants (something Sabean hates) with that many spots open, and only Blach, Beede, Suarez, Stratton as possible starters. Plus, there is the possibility of Cain being re-signed after the Giants buy him out, but, as I think his time with us is done.
Cain is Not Able
I was totally wrong about Cain. He appeared to be figuring things out last season, just before he got injured, but that apparently was a mirage, as he has not been good, even in short stints, this season. Nothings shows this more than his very poor 5.3 K/9 for the season and 1.39 K/BB ratio. And he did have a nice 4 game stretch in April, after having a full spring training where he wasn't doing well but was excusing it by saying that he was working on things for the season.
But it is almost like he injured himself somehow after the San Diego game or during the Reds game that started his debacle stretch of the season. Only one start after that with over 4 strikeouts. And homeruns galore, 11 given up in those 12 starts, 63.0 IP but only 31 K's but also 27 walks. That added up to a 7.00 ERA and .928 OPS, as well as a .360 BABIP. As poorly as Blach has pitched in recent games, Cain has been horrible, and most likely will be the pitcher leaving the rotation when Bumgarner returns.
Though, to be fair, in Blach's last 6 starts: 6.95 ERA, 33.2 IP, 50 hits, 4 homers, only 20 K's, but at least only 8 walks, still for a .932 OPS and .380 BABIP, which is pretty much as bad as Cain has been. So perhaps the Giants will allow Cain to finish up the season as a starter, though they did skip his last start of the first half in order to throw Cueto out there, upon which he pitched even worse than how Cain had been pitching. Based on this, I would be OK with letting Cain finish up the season in the rotation, if they want to respect him in that way, though obviously the best thing would be to DFA him and let Blach pitch and learn. The decision will be interesting.
Plans for the Rest of the Season
The Giants are in prime draft position for next season: they have the second pick, currently. Too bad it wasn't for this season, as then we could have gotten Hunter Greene, he would have been an interesting prospect for the Giants to have.
In any case, I'm all for trading off Cueto and Nunez, and perhaps others (Span? Pence?), but not any of our homegrown guys nor our rotation, as I assume the plan to do reload and try to get into the playoffs again in 2018. Trading off beyond those two don't really make any sense unless we get back something more than what we gave up, and since we'll be trading with playoff contenders, that type of trade won't make sense for them to do.
I assume both are tradeable. At this point, I don't even need much, even though I once harbored dreams of getting a nice batch of prospects for Cueto. Then the team would be set up for staying in prime draft position.
With Cueto gone, our rotation would be Bumgarner, Samardzija, Moore, Blach, and Cain. With Moore, Blach, and Cain struggling to find a way to be good, there should be enough poor performances there to keep us near the bottom, and thus near the top of the draft. In addition, both Bumgarner and Samardzija have their own question marks.
Bumgarner is no guarantee to bust out of the gates as his usual self, as he has a recent history of poor starts to the season, plus he really hasn't had any spring training preparedness to be starting the second game of the second half. It would not be surprising if he is rusty in his first few starts back, which is just fine for this scenario. Then he could work himself into his usual MadBum shape sometime in August and finish strongly to lead into 2018.
Samardzija, in addition, has been horrible in his last five starts. There is no guarantee that he will get back to what he was doing in May and June, nor what he was doing for much of 2016 (he did finish 2016 with a 3.66 ERA in the second half and had a 3.14 ERA on June 17, before a bad 8 start stretch from then to early August, 6.99 ERA, killed his overall ERA). Interesting how the wheels came off this season on June 16, while it came off on June 22 last season. For 2015, it was June 2nd. June 1st for 2014. June 8th for 2013. So that seems to be a thing for him, but the good news is that he usually comes back sometimes after that.
With Nunez traded, then the lineup would be Span (may as well not start Gorkys anymore in platoon), Panik, Belt, Posey, Pence, Crawford, Hwang, Hernandez (since Slater is out for the season, basically, Parker isn't ready, and Williamson was just sent down to AAA). Hwang and Hernandez are question marks, and Span has been up and down, with him being really down against LHP. Plus, Pence and Crawford have not been hitting as well as expected, and Panik has been up and down. That is not a recipe for a strong offense, and relieving our budget of Cueto would allow the Giants to pick up a free agent starting LF next season.
Your 2018 Giants
And running through our options for 2018, it is no slamdunk that the team will be playoff competitive next season.
We will need Bumgarner to return to normal, while both Samardzija and Moore pitch more like their good selves and not their bad selves. We'll also need some growth from Blach and probably Beede (Suarez?) for the back of the rotation to be respectable. Sure, they are all reasonable on a one-by-one basis, but adding up all those probabilities will leave a lot of scenarios where the rotation will falter in some way.
The lineup would look as good as expected in 2017, but will players return to prior norms and not repeat 2017? Will Pence be like he was before? Will Crawford, who is not as far into his 30's, be able to duplicate peak year production of 2015-2016? Will Panik ever get back to his goodness in his first full season? And hopefully Belt and Posey will be as good as usual.
And I still don't understand the hate on Belt. The latest complaint I've seen is how inconsistent he is. Over the last three seasons, 2015-2017, on a monthly basis, with at least 23 starts in the month, out of 14 months (and I'm counting this July even though he's not at 23 games started yet, but is hitting .994 OPS), he only has one month under .714 OPS, only 2 months under .766 OPS, and only 4 months under .799 OPS, which is pretty good. It is not as great as the leading offensive hitters in the majors, sure, but 1) we aren't paying him at that level, 2) he brings a lot of defensive value (roughly 1 win per season with his defense per DRS over the 2015-2017 period), 3) he's still the second best hitter on the team behind Posey, no matter what anybody has said about his offense, he led in OPS in 2013, was injured a lot in 2014, was second to Posey in 2015, led the team by a lot in 2016, and is second to Posey again in 2017. His offense is the least to complain about in our lineup, there are a lot more disappointments among Pence, Crawford, Panik, 3B (except for Nunez), and LF (except for Slater), plus the bench, except for Hundley.
Still, it seems like a lot of the issues the team has been having are BABIP related and thus some hope for regression to the mean in 2018. It is just that it seems to be killing both hitters and pitchers alike, for the most part, so is it BABIP bad luck, or the inevitable decline that age brings?
Hence why we need a burst of prospect magic dust by holding onto this primo draft position. No team should play to get to this position. But since we are here now, why not take advantage of it and just float along for the rest of the season?
Even if the Giants play decent .500 ball the rest of the way, the team will still end up 70-92. That would have given us the 8th pick last season. And just to get to .500 overall would take a .653 winning percentage the rest of the season (a 105 win-rate for a season!). If the Giants play at the same poor rate for the rest of the season, they are headed for a 101 loss season. One of the beat writers (or many more) noted that the Giants are so far behind right now that it is the worse we have been behind since the 1902 New York Giants. And their winning percentage right now might be riding high, after their recent winning streak boosted things, as they were battling for the worse record overall at that time.
May as well play the hand dealt us and keep to the bottom, like we did in 1986, the last time in recent memory the team played so badly overall. That netted us the Will Clark pick that turned the franchise around. Don't muck around and try to win more, like they did in 2013 at the end of the season, pushing themselves out of a Top 10 overall pick.
Of course, even top picks are not slam dunks, but they are as near as we will ever get with anything in baseball. And as I noted in my business plan, that's the way a team can rebuild, by losing and losing badly, like the Braves did before in the 80's to build the base for the 90's.
So I hope the Giants management take it easy with the team and the roster. Trade away guys who might not be around anyway, in Cueto and Nunez. If contenders really need a reliever, I would be willing to trade away older relievers Strickland, Gearrin, Kontos, Osich, even Melancon, in the right deal (netting a good prospect for little money; and must keep Dyson if this happens). Relievers are not fungible, but we have a lot of young talent in the minors, bring them up and see what they can do as a reliever. If anyone would take Span without much money sent along, trade him. Same with Pence, as much as I would prefer to keep him, but cutting a big salary will open up options on free agency for 2018 (with Cain and Nunez salaries off, plus perhaps Cueto and others).
Play the young guys more, by platooning with the older guys, or just start them (Hwang in 3B, young guy in LF), that's win-win, as we saw with Arroyo and Slater: if they struggle, they should learn from the experience, and at worse, the Giants have a better handle on their actual MLB value, and if they hit/pitch, then you got another nice player.
Slater looks like he can be a nice complementary player, for example. One has to think that his poor player recently was due to him already dealing with some pain from the muscle he eventually pulled off his bone, he probably had already injured himself and kept it quiet until it ripped off. Too bad on the timing, but he should be given a great shot to win a spot in spring training for 2018, if not a chance to start in LF.
ogc thoughts
After the offense broke out in June of their poor performance in April/May, they returned to the badness of the start of the season. Only Brandon Belt - who somehow always seems to be the whipping horse of Giants fan - produced out the regulars in July, before the break. Everyone else, including Posey (even Slater, before his essentially season ending injury), hit poorly.
The pitching didn't do much better either, not as good as April/May, but at least better than their horrible June. It is like the pitching and hitting just can't do well at the same time. Though at least the offense was great in June, the pitching hasn't really clicked at all during the 2017 season, it has been all relatively bad compared to prior years.
Starting Pitching Been Bad
There are a variety of reasons for that. Of course, the biggest one is that Bumgarner has been out because of his biking injury. Blach has been decent in replacement, but he's been mostly an innings eater, perfect for the back of the rotation, not so much in replacing Bumgarner's normal production. Not that I expected him to be a carbon copy, and a 4.59 ERA is actually decent for a rookie starter, but his great start gave me hope that he might deliver a better performance than this, with a very poor 4.2 K/9.
Cueto No Bueno
Cueto has been bad as well. In a recent interview, he blamed it on him missing most of spring training, and not getting himself ready properly. However, as Bochy noted when given this explanation by beat writers, said that might be true, but we're 3 months into the season now, he should have gotten into playing shape by now. Of course, part of the reason he missed spring training was because he was busy dealing with his ailing father. And he brought his father with him to the States to take care of him still, so perhaps he's still mentally dealing with that, and professional sports is already hard enough to play without distractions, and having a sick family member distract is a very understandable reason, assuming he's still dealing with that issue.
And distraction or lack of focus appears to be part of the answer for Cueto's woes. His K/9 rate is up there with what he's been doing and is above his career numbers, but his walk rate and HR rate are both sky high, among the worse in his career, basically where he was when he first started in the majors. And loss of focus would contribute greatly to a sharp increase in walks (50% higher than in recent years) and homers (also more than 50% higher), as he would make more mistakes into the zone and out of the zone, missing the corners.
Also, maybe he's not as into his "act" on the mound, as he has been in recent years. He clearly had fun with that from what I saw of him previously. Maybe it's not as fun with his father ailing, and he does not put as much effort into it. Whatever the case may be, his 4.51 ERA is barely better than what Blach has contributed, which is nowhere close to what we should be expecting out of him. That not only kills his trade value, which I had been hoping given this season, but increases the odds that he picks up his player's option, which, as much as I loved what he did last season, I did not want to commit that much to him over the next four seasons. Hopefully the break will give his mind the rest he needs to reset and he can start pitching like he can during the rest of July (four starts) and showcase his trade value.
Moore Has Been Less
Moore has had a lost season. He has been up and down, but mostly down, as apparently he has been struggling to thrown his normal repertoire of pitches because he added a cutter since joining the Giants, and that got him out of his normal mechanics enough to throw him off. So he's stopped using that pitch, and has been searching for his former mechanics.
There is already talk among the beats and fans that perhaps the Giants should seriously consider not picking up his option for next season for $9M and instead buy him out for $1M. This is ridiculous, because the assumption underlying that is that he can't even muster up a season like 2016, and unless there is something physically wrong, he should be able to do something like that, which was worth 2.0 BWar, which is worth roughly double the $8M extra we would be paying him for. So the downside is that if he's still bad next season, as long as he can have a bounceback year and get back to a semblance of 2016, he should be able to give us 1.0 BWar, which would be production that matches his cost. It's a risk, but I would take that type of risk, as long as the Giants don't think there is something physically wrong with him.
The Shark Is An Enigma
How does one strike out 9.7 K/9 and only walk 1.1 BB/9 for a stupendously great 9.07 K/BB ratio, and still have an ERA basically the same as Ty Blach, who didn't even strike out half as many, while walking more? 4.58 ERA is not what one would expect.
The homers are doing him in, as he has a career high (as a starter) 1.4 HR/9 going this season, and much like his lost season with the White Sox, the homers appear to be doing in his ERA. His H/9 is also high, so apparently when he's not striking out guys, they are making very good contact with his pitches. His BABIP is a sky high .327, and that is his high for his career, worse since his first season as a starter.
Not only that, but hitters are hitting him like a power hitter, as overall, his ISO for hitters is 198. That is just too many mistakes going into the hitters' wheelhouse. There is no good reason for hitters to be hitting him that well.
I assume this is still part of the adjustments Samardzija has been making with the Giants Pitching Brain Trust. When you are learning, you tend to make more mistakes, and it seems to me that was what was affecting him a lot with the White Sox, as they worked a lot with him too. I thought that he made a lot of progress last season, and the great K/BB ratio suggests that he's still working on other lessons given him this season, with the poor ERA a sign that he's still struggling with parts of those lessons.
Looking at his game by game stats, there seems to be three distinct phases:
- Phase 1: Starts 1-5: He had a 6.32 ERA, and hitters were hitting him hard, .269/.338/.487/.826, with a .329 BABIP and 218 ISO. And he had good enough peripherals, except for the homers: 31.1 IP, 32 hits, 10 BB, 35 SO, 6 homers.
- Phase 2: Starts 6-12: He had a great 2.98 ERA, and he was mostly containing the hitters, .259/.265/.422/.686, except for the power (163 ISO), though he got his homer-itis down, with only 4 homers in those 7 starts. 49.1 IP, 48 hits (for very high .355 BABIP), 1 BB, 59 K's.
- Phase 3: Starts 13-18: He had a 5.17 ERA, and the power output flew sky high as his strikeouts went down, with a .269/.283/.494/.777 for a 225 ISO (whole teams were hitting him like good sluggers). In 38.1 IP, 42 hits, 3 walks, 33 K's, but 8 homers, for a nearly 2.0 HR/9 (goal is under 1.0 HR/9).
Admittedly, very small samples, but still, they represent three different results. In Phase 1, he was doing his thing and it wasn't working well. In Phase 2, he was able to get his control and command down pretty well, but kept on missing badly on occasion, when the hitter would make him pay, with with so few runners on, not many runs scored. In Phase 3, it appears that he adjusted his style to strikeout less guys in order to induce less contact, which worked in reducing his BABIP down to the normal mean, but ended up with him giving up even more homers. If it was just the hitters adjusting to him, then I would think that his BABIP would have gotten worse.
Hopefully Phase 4 begins after the ASB. The coaches will break down what's working and what's not, and he will clear his mind of some of the clutter of the season. I would just let him continue doing what he was doing when he was going good and work from there, letting him consolidate the learning of this season, and stop changing him, which will only lead to more mistakes.
As I discussed when we first signed him, I view the signings of him and Cueto as a pair of matching bookends. Cueto is the co-ace to pair up with Bumgarner for the first two seasons, while the Giants work on Samardzija to get him up to ace level performance. As much as we are paying him, salaries in baseball today is such that we are only paying him for slightly better than average WAR production, roughly short of 2.5 WAR, which he more than delivered last season, and is falling short of this season, but over the two seasons, should be pretty close to break even.
I was hoping for quicker results, but I guess the Brain Trust had its work cut out with the Shark. Still, we have some time still, the rest of this season, for him to figure things out going forward. That's why I'm against any of the talk about trading him off. They seem to be getting close to figuring him out, and just need to fine tune some things to get him there.
And there is no rush to get rid of him either, we will still need him in future seasons, as even if Cueto opts to stay, Cain will be leaving the rotation before the 2018 season, and perhaps soon, and Beede has been having growing pains in AAA this season, leaving Blach as the only alternative there, unless Suarez can continue to develop. If Samardzija is traded, that's two rotation spots we need to fill, and if Cueto does decide to opt out (ominous that he complained about the lack of Latin players on the roster; ironic as there was plenty not that long ago), that would be three spots.
Thus, I don't see how the Giants can trade off either of Moore or Samardzija, as some have suggested, that's just too many rotation spots filled with question marks, and even if they could sign a free agent, they will have great leverage on the Giants (something Sabean hates) with that many spots open, and only Blach, Beede, Suarez, Stratton as possible starters. Plus, there is the possibility of Cain being re-signed after the Giants buy him out, but, as I think his time with us is done.
Cain is Not Able
I was totally wrong about Cain. He appeared to be figuring things out last season, just before he got injured, but that apparently was a mirage, as he has not been good, even in short stints, this season. Nothings shows this more than his very poor 5.3 K/9 for the season and 1.39 K/BB ratio. And he did have a nice 4 game stretch in April, after having a full spring training where he wasn't doing well but was excusing it by saying that he was working on things for the season.
But it is almost like he injured himself somehow after the San Diego game or during the Reds game that started his debacle stretch of the season. Only one start after that with over 4 strikeouts. And homeruns galore, 11 given up in those 12 starts, 63.0 IP but only 31 K's but also 27 walks. That added up to a 7.00 ERA and .928 OPS, as well as a .360 BABIP. As poorly as Blach has pitched in recent games, Cain has been horrible, and most likely will be the pitcher leaving the rotation when Bumgarner returns.
Though, to be fair, in Blach's last 6 starts: 6.95 ERA, 33.2 IP, 50 hits, 4 homers, only 20 K's, but at least only 8 walks, still for a .932 OPS and .380 BABIP, which is pretty much as bad as Cain has been. So perhaps the Giants will allow Cain to finish up the season as a starter, though they did skip his last start of the first half in order to throw Cueto out there, upon which he pitched even worse than how Cain had been pitching. Based on this, I would be OK with letting Cain finish up the season in the rotation, if they want to respect him in that way, though obviously the best thing would be to DFA him and let Blach pitch and learn. The decision will be interesting.
Plans for the Rest of the Season
The Giants are in prime draft position for next season: they have the second pick, currently. Too bad it wasn't for this season, as then we could have gotten Hunter Greene, he would have been an interesting prospect for the Giants to have.
In any case, I'm all for trading off Cueto and Nunez, and perhaps others (Span? Pence?), but not any of our homegrown guys nor our rotation, as I assume the plan to do reload and try to get into the playoffs again in 2018. Trading off beyond those two don't really make any sense unless we get back something more than what we gave up, and since we'll be trading with playoff contenders, that type of trade won't make sense for them to do.
I assume both are tradeable. At this point, I don't even need much, even though I once harbored dreams of getting a nice batch of prospects for Cueto. Then the team would be set up for staying in prime draft position.
With Cueto gone, our rotation would be Bumgarner, Samardzija, Moore, Blach, and Cain. With Moore, Blach, and Cain struggling to find a way to be good, there should be enough poor performances there to keep us near the bottom, and thus near the top of the draft. In addition, both Bumgarner and Samardzija have their own question marks.
Bumgarner is no guarantee to bust out of the gates as his usual self, as he has a recent history of poor starts to the season, plus he really hasn't had any spring training preparedness to be starting the second game of the second half. It would not be surprising if he is rusty in his first few starts back, which is just fine for this scenario. Then he could work himself into his usual MadBum shape sometime in August and finish strongly to lead into 2018.
Samardzija, in addition, has been horrible in his last five starts. There is no guarantee that he will get back to what he was doing in May and June, nor what he was doing for much of 2016 (he did finish 2016 with a 3.66 ERA in the second half and had a 3.14 ERA on June 17, before a bad 8 start stretch from then to early August, 6.99 ERA, killed his overall ERA). Interesting how the wheels came off this season on June 16, while it came off on June 22 last season. For 2015, it was June 2nd. June 1st for 2014. June 8th for 2013. So that seems to be a thing for him, but the good news is that he usually comes back sometimes after that.
With Nunez traded, then the lineup would be Span (may as well not start Gorkys anymore in platoon), Panik, Belt, Posey, Pence, Crawford, Hwang, Hernandez (since Slater is out for the season, basically, Parker isn't ready, and Williamson was just sent down to AAA). Hwang and Hernandez are question marks, and Span has been up and down, with him being really down against LHP. Plus, Pence and Crawford have not been hitting as well as expected, and Panik has been up and down. That is not a recipe for a strong offense, and relieving our budget of Cueto would allow the Giants to pick up a free agent starting LF next season.
Your 2018 Giants
And running through our options for 2018, it is no slamdunk that the team will be playoff competitive next season.
We will need Bumgarner to return to normal, while both Samardzija and Moore pitch more like their good selves and not their bad selves. We'll also need some growth from Blach and probably Beede (Suarez?) for the back of the rotation to be respectable. Sure, they are all reasonable on a one-by-one basis, but adding up all those probabilities will leave a lot of scenarios where the rotation will falter in some way.
The lineup would look as good as expected in 2017, but will players return to prior norms and not repeat 2017? Will Pence be like he was before? Will Crawford, who is not as far into his 30's, be able to duplicate peak year production of 2015-2016? Will Panik ever get back to his goodness in his first full season? And hopefully Belt and Posey will be as good as usual.
And I still don't understand the hate on Belt. The latest complaint I've seen is how inconsistent he is. Over the last three seasons, 2015-2017, on a monthly basis, with at least 23 starts in the month, out of 14 months (and I'm counting this July even though he's not at 23 games started yet, but is hitting .994 OPS), he only has one month under .714 OPS, only 2 months under .766 OPS, and only 4 months under .799 OPS, which is pretty good. It is not as great as the leading offensive hitters in the majors, sure, but 1) we aren't paying him at that level, 2) he brings a lot of defensive value (roughly 1 win per season with his defense per DRS over the 2015-2017 period), 3) he's still the second best hitter on the team behind Posey, no matter what anybody has said about his offense, he led in OPS in 2013, was injured a lot in 2014, was second to Posey in 2015, led the team by a lot in 2016, and is second to Posey again in 2017. His offense is the least to complain about in our lineup, there are a lot more disappointments among Pence, Crawford, Panik, 3B (except for Nunez), and LF (except for Slater), plus the bench, except for Hundley.
Still, it seems like a lot of the issues the team has been having are BABIP related and thus some hope for regression to the mean in 2018. It is just that it seems to be killing both hitters and pitchers alike, for the most part, so is it BABIP bad luck, or the inevitable decline that age brings?
Hence why we need a burst of prospect magic dust by holding onto this primo draft position. No team should play to get to this position. But since we are here now, why not take advantage of it and just float along for the rest of the season?
Even if the Giants play decent .500 ball the rest of the way, the team will still end up 70-92. That would have given us the 8th pick last season. And just to get to .500 overall would take a .653 winning percentage the rest of the season (a 105 win-rate for a season!). If the Giants play at the same poor rate for the rest of the season, they are headed for a 101 loss season. One of the beat writers (or many more) noted that the Giants are so far behind right now that it is the worse we have been behind since the 1902 New York Giants. And their winning percentage right now might be riding high, after their recent winning streak boosted things, as they were battling for the worse record overall at that time.
May as well play the hand dealt us and keep to the bottom, like we did in 1986, the last time in recent memory the team played so badly overall. That netted us the Will Clark pick that turned the franchise around. Don't muck around and try to win more, like they did in 2013 at the end of the season, pushing themselves out of a Top 10 overall pick.
Of course, even top picks are not slam dunks, but they are as near as we will ever get with anything in baseball. And as I noted in my business plan, that's the way a team can rebuild, by losing and losing badly, like the Braves did before in the 80's to build the base for the 90's.
So I hope the Giants management take it easy with the team and the roster. Trade away guys who might not be around anyway, in Cueto and Nunez. If contenders really need a reliever, I would be willing to trade away older relievers Strickland, Gearrin, Kontos, Osich, even Melancon, in the right deal (netting a good prospect for little money; and must keep Dyson if this happens). Relievers are not fungible, but we have a lot of young talent in the minors, bring them up and see what they can do as a reliever. If anyone would take Span without much money sent along, trade him. Same with Pence, as much as I would prefer to keep him, but cutting a big salary will open up options on free agency for 2018 (with Cain and Nunez salaries off, plus perhaps Cueto and others).
Play the young guys more, by platooning with the older guys, or just start them (Hwang in 3B, young guy in LF), that's win-win, as we saw with Arroyo and Slater: if they struggle, they should learn from the experience, and at worse, the Giants have a better handle on their actual MLB value, and if they hit/pitch, then you got another nice player.
Slater looks like he can be a nice complementary player, for example. One has to think that his poor player recently was due to him already dealing with some pain from the muscle he eventually pulled off his bone, he probably had already injured himself and kept it quiet until it ripped off. Too bad on the timing, but he should be given a great shot to win a spot in spring training for 2018, if not a chance to start in LF.
Monday, July 03, 2017
2017 Giants: June PQS
This post has the Giants Pure Quality Start scores for the month of June 2017, PQS as defined in Ron Shandler's Baseball Forecaster annual book and they published the details here (unfortunately, they removed the article; this link gets you at least to the PQS definition, read down to middle for details). I wrote on this first in 2006 (wow, 12th year of this!) and have compiled their stats on a regular basis, so I'm continuing it this season for continuity and historical comparison (there is the "PQS" label that you can click to see the old posts on this). Regular readers can skip to the next section.
This is the Quality Start with a sabermetric DIPS twist, and it gets really easy to calculate once you get used to it. I don't think it's the end all or be all, but then nothing really is that. It is, as I like to say, another piece of the puzzle. A dominating start is scored a 4 or 5 and a disaster start is scored a 0 or 1. DOM% is the percentage of starts that are dominating, DIS% is the percentage of starts that are disasters (any start under 5.0 IP is automatically a 0, or disaster).
This is the Quality Start with a sabermetric DIPS twist, and it gets really easy to calculate once you get used to it. I don't think it's the end all or be all, but then nothing really is that. It is, as I like to say, another piece of the puzzle. A dominating start is scored a 4 or 5 and a disaster start is scored a 0 or 1. DOM% is the percentage of starts that are dominating, DIS% is the percentage of starts that are disasters (any start under 5.0 IP is automatically a 0, or disaster).